All Forum Comments
Comment by Aitch53 posted on RAW processors at 08/09/2013 - 17:00
JohnX wrote:
All good cameras. However, the G3 and 5 have both interchangable lenses AND an EVF. Both of which I would want.Aitch53 wrote:
Cheers, chaps.
Plus I would much prefer a mirrorless type, like the Lumix G3 or 5, rather than a big SLR. Shame Ricoh/Pentax don't do one.
Au contraire! In changeable lens country there's the K-mount K-01, (now only available second hand in the UK), the Q's, all well respected and highly regarded, and in fixed lens the MX-1 and Ricoh GR.(I'm not ignoring the various compacts from both brands- well I am I suppose:rollCheers, chaps.
Plus I would much prefer a mirrorless type, like the Lumix G3 or 5, rather than a big SLR. Shame Ricoh/Pentax don't do one.
Comment by Aitch53 posted on Another Oldie... at 08/09/2013 - 15:28
McGregNi wrote:
No, I'm afraid not. Most people are only interested in instant results - the moment you mention anything slightly technical or explain any factor that might have gone into creating the shot, they just turn off.
What they want is a new camera-phone that will automatically create the great shots and provide the technical know-how and processing skills with the push of one button.
Yeah, you're probably right.No, I'm afraid not. Most people are only interested in instant results - the moment you mention anything slightly technical or explain any factor that might have gone into creating the shot, they just turn off.
What they want is a new camera-phone that will automatically create the great shots and provide the technical know-how and processing skills with the push of one button.
But if just one or two people listen to what you say and explore further, it makes it worth explaining. Even if most people glaze over.
Comment by Aitch53 posted on Wedding Photographer at 08/09/2013 - 14:15
McGregNi wrote:
I can't think of how many times I've been a bit annoyed by non-photographers passing comment - you know the sort - they glance at some shots on the laptop and say 'they look great - you must have a really good camera!'.
Yes I do ! But it never occurs to them for a second that there is anything more to it than just the special camera. This indicates the same kind of ignorance of what is involved. Frankly there shouldn't be the expectation on those of us with good cameras that we can necessarily fill in for pros in a pro capacity.
Maybe there's a germ of something good in this. In that they are beginning to realise that the results from their phone are low quality and they may need to buy a proper camera to get qood (IQ wise) pictures. I can't think of how many times I've been a bit annoyed by non-photographers passing comment - you know the sort - they glance at some shots on the laptop and say 'they look great - you must have a really good camera!'.
Yes I do ! But it never occurs to them for a second that there is anything more to it than just the special camera. This indicates the same kind of ignorance of what is involved. Frankly there shouldn't be the expectation on those of us with good cameras that we can necessarily fill in for pros in a pro capacity.
Got to be good for the industry and the hobby.
Comment by Aitch53 posted on Wedding Photographer at 08/09/2013 - 13:03
Cheers, chaps.
Suspect I won't, Lottery win excepted, be weaned off the X5, John. Limited disposable income puts paid to that idea! Plus I would much prefer a mirrorless type, like the Lumix G3 or 5, rather than a big SLR. Shame Ricoh/Pentax don't do one.
With respect to dust ingress, Drummerboy, I've always wondered why they don't install a small shutter that covers the sensor when there is no lens or cap in place or when the camera is turned off. Sure, it would push the price up, but would cut down on time wasted doing repairs.
Anyway, off to play with my, finally arrived, X5. I've checked all the relevant bits seem to work, next phase is to play with all the 'creative' filters and get them out of my system.
Suspect I won't, Lottery win excepted, be weaned off the X5, John. Limited disposable income puts paid to that idea! Plus I would much prefer a mirrorless type, like the Lumix G3 or 5, rather than a big SLR. Shame Ricoh/Pentax don't do one.
With respect to dust ingress, Drummerboy, I've always wondered why they don't install a small shutter that covers the sensor when there is no lens or cap in place or when the camera is turned off. Sure, it would push the price up, but would cut down on time wasted doing repairs.
Anyway, off to play with my, finally arrived, X5. I've checked all the relevant bits seem to work, next phase is to play with all the 'creative' filters and get them out of my system.
Comment by Aitch53 posted on Another Oldie... at 08/09/2013 - 11:36
In the end, I went with Barrie's suggestion. I'll let you know what the results are.
One other thing, it finally arrived today, the X5 that is. Although Amazon's tracking system still thinks it's in Weybridge. Anyway, the Amazon packaging (ie the cardboard box) has a big "Caution: Lithium Ion Battery" sticker on it. I assume they think all digital cameras are Li-ion powered and stick the label on as a default.
One other thing, it finally arrived today, the X5 that is. Although Amazon's tracking system still thinks it's in Weybridge. Anyway, the Amazon packaging (ie the cardboard box) has a big "Caution: Lithium Ion Battery" sticker on it. I assume they think all digital cameras are Li-ion powered and stick the label on as a default.
Comment by Aitch53 posted on Pentax Web Site... at 06/09/2013 - 10:55
Thanks, Barrie.
I had seen that page, but none of the form destinations seem to apply.
Looks like a phone call or nothing.
Steve.
I had seen that page, but none of the form destinations seem to apply.
Looks like a phone call or nothing.
Steve.
Comment by Aitch53 posted on Pentax Web Site... at 05/09/2013 - 11:27
Thanks, John.
Comment by Aitch53 posted on Pentax Web Site... at 05/09/2013 - 10:07
Yeah, I know, it's the Ricoh-Imaging website, but Pentax.co.uk gets you there.
Anyway, when I was casting around for a bridge camera, I checked the Pentax/Ricoh site for info in the X5. In doing so, I noticed two things:
1. Even though the spec page for the X5 states it runs, as we know, on 4 AA batteries, the accessories page claims it comes with a Lithium-ion battery and charger.
2. There is no apparent way to contact them about web-site problems/errors.
Any suggestions regarding the second point?
Anyway, when I was casting around for a bridge camera, I checked the Pentax/Ricoh site for info in the X5. In doing so, I noticed two things:
1. Even though the spec page for the X5 states it runs, as we know, on 4 AA batteries, the accessories page claims it comes with a Lithium-ion battery and charger.
2. There is no apparent way to contact them about web-site problems/errors.
Any suggestions regarding the second point?
Comment by Aitch53 posted on Pentax Web Site... at 04/09/2013 - 15:50
Interesting. I seem to have ordered mine from the dreaded Amazon just before they upped the price from £140 to £160. I've just checked their confirmation e-mail and it definitely has the lower price.
Comment by Aitch53 posted on The cheapest X-5 yet at 02/09/2013 - 13:45
Apparently includes Lightroom as well.