All Forum Comments
Prieni
Comment by Prieni posted on Weekly Competition #82: Comments at 26/01/2009 - 19:55
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/gtisIMGP0007a.jpg[/IMG]
I've lightened the foreground a bit and darkened the clouds. A little S-curve adjustment, unsharp mask with big radius, low intensity and unsharp mask again with 0.6 radius and a bit stronger applied.
Perhaps a bit over the top but goes to show what you can do (and if you do that on the original the result will be a bit better).
The second one has great light. Shame that the sky is blown a bit (i.e. too bright). If you crop the sky out almost completely it looks sublime and the longer I look at it the more I like it...
Prieni
No, more seriously, Martin, good themes. I don't think I have any bicycle shots in my archives that are worth submitting (if I have anything at all). And the frozen water is a bit elusive at the moment. I have something in the freezer as a backup plan but there is some time and maybe the weather is turning colder before the end of the competition period.
Prieni
Comment by Prieni posted on Weekly Competition #82: Comments at 26/01/2009 - 18:24
Could it be that the many Canon pictures we look at over the time (not to speak of high-saturation TV series like CSI) slowly corrupt our good taste?
Some posters over on depressing reviews did say that they crank up saturation when submitting to the PPG. Apparently it does help to survive the peer review. (I haven't adjusted the saturation for my submissions but manipulated gamma and contrast in SilkyPix, resulting sometimes in (as you put it) radioactive colours so that I have to reduce saturation a bit).
Maybe it is just us getting old...
I better end on this happy note
Prieni
The suggestion that there are two different user bases is bogus because the versions are so similar and amateaurs will enjoy the new features such as the cloning tool just as much as the pros. The two different groups in fact will be: the rich and the poor!
You could perhaps have phrased it a bit more diplomatic, but I think you are right on the money (pun intended).
Prieni
Comment by Prieni posted on Update on Silkypix forums and Silkypix Pro (V4) at 24/01/2009 - 18:33
I was just over on depressing reviews and the thread there when I got your response.
So I hope that my price from their competition is upgradeable to PRO version (I already have two licenses of 3.0).
Cheers,
Prieni
Comment by Prieni posted on Update on Silkypix forums and Silkypix Pro (V4) at 24/01/2009 - 12:35
"The 3.0 version had a different user base than the PRO version..." : There hasn't been a pro version so far, or has it?
All I can read into this is that there will be a higher price for SP4...
BTW: I was told by a member of this forum that I made the 2. place in Shortcut's photo contest. Haven't heard from them, though... The announcement must have been made shortly before the WEB site troubles started.
Prieni
Comment by Prieni posted on Update on Silkypix forums and Silkypix Pro (V4) at 24/01/2009 - 12:16
Good luck with the retake!
Prieni
Comment by Prieni posted on feed back on this image at 23/01/2009 - 17:15
Prieni
Comment by Prieni posted on "Holiday" lens at 22/01/2009 - 08:38


Ok, since you don't mind, here's what I see in the second one:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/gtisIMGP0008.jpg[/IMG]
I think it looks very dreamy and so I used a blurred layer underneath a normal layer with layer mode soft light to get the dreamy glows. Also it does serve as a bit of a curve adjustment. It also increases the saturation a bit.
Hope you like what I saw in your picture.
Prieni