All Forum Comments
Comment by niblue posted on How many keepers do you get, on average? at 26/08/2007 - 15:53
Comment by niblue posted on Discussion: Weekly Competition #8: Reflection at 27/08/2007 - 14:51
One point I was trying to make in my post though was that macro photography doesn't have to be expensive. The lens I used cost £50.00 and the Raynox adapter was £30.00 My SMCP-FA 100mm 1:2.8 macro lens was nearly £400.00 . . . and tubes another £40 . . . and bellows . . . etc.
Comment by niblue posted on Macro photography setups at 04/09/2007 - 17:53
The lens has a pretty good reputation however if you're interested in macro primarily then a dedicated macro lens is likely to be significantly better. I've been using an old Vivitar 55mm F2.8 macro in Pentax K mount that I got from EBay cheap and the results have been quite decent.
Comment by niblue posted on Can I use this lens for macro at 26/08/2007 - 11:22
Wi-fi, connecting the new Pentax-Mac camera
Comment by niblue posted on A lot to loose if one goes wrong !! at 25/08/2007 - 15:21
Is it normal for the 16-45 to slightly wobbly at the front? When you grab the front end of it you can slightly move it about a bit, I didn't really notice it before.
Comment by niblue posted on 16-45 construction at 25/08/2007 - 11:02
He never had to replace his Nikon or Olympus lenses though, so I suppose that tells us something.
Comment by niblue posted on Tamron sp AF 90mm 2.5 Macro at 25/08/2007 - 11:04
They've got a good reputation for macro lenses though so I'd expect it'll perform well.
Comment by niblue posted on Tamron sp AF 90mm 2.5 Macro at 25/08/2007 - 09:28
Comment by niblue posted on Old & New Lens for Pentax at 25/08/2007 - 09:30
I think there was some non bashing, usefull discussion on the thread, that could've been left, but recognize and respect the moderators decsision to remove.
Best call was made, under the circumstances.
Comment by niblue posted on Im almost off and away..RANT! at 26/08/2007 - 15:55
