niblue

Joined: 13th December 2005

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

niblue
Quote:
Well I don't think I'll be taking part. I fly off to Scotland on Friday and am back Monday with no way or processing or uploading images. I can still browse the forum but can't actually do anything else.

Lots of things to shoot in Scotland. Ah well...
Just back from a few days up in the North West of Scotland myself. I wish I'd know the theme was going to be water before I got back though as I'd have looked harder for a suitable entry!

Comment by niblue posted on Discussion: Weekly Competition No 9 - Water at 04/09/2007 - 14:13

niblue
Quote:
FA*85/1.4 added to wish list!
There are some cheap/fast options as well - my fastest lens is a old K-mount 55mm F1.2 Porst that cost next to nothing on Ebay. Ok it's not the sharpest wide open but it does work. An Pentax 50mm F1.2 would be nice but those tend to make serious cash 2nd hand - as does the FA* 85mm F1.4.

Comment by niblue posted on Monopods at 05/09/2007 - 17:09

niblue
[quote="MattMatic"]
Quote:
A monopod is a definitely good idea in this circumstance and will probably give you a stop or two further... but if the Tv is too slow you'll see movement in the people, unless they're absolutely still.
I'd have thought that was definitely a consideration in this case.

Quote:
Failing that you'll need something like the FA*85/1.4
That's what I bought mine for.

Comment by niblue posted on Monopods at 05/09/2007 - 16:57

niblue
I've owned a monopod (one of the Manfrotto ones) for at least a decade now however I'd be surprised if it's had a dozen outings in all that time.

It's definitely an improvement on hand-holding but not by as much as I'd expected (perhaps I don't have long enough lenses) and also, IMHO, not as much as the K10D's image stabiliser. In low light conditions I usually find something to brace myself against and I think that works at least as well as a monopod as well.

What subject where you shooting? One option might be to shoot raw and deliberately underexpose the image to get a higher shutter speed - later fixing the exposure on the computer.

Comment by niblue posted on Monopods at 05/09/2007 - 14:10

niblue
I didn't have a shot worth using in this category so I decided to shoot something specifically for the competition, and as our kitchen tap was dripping...

Comment Image


Pentax K10D, Vivitar 55mm F2.8 Macro, AF360FGZ flash, 1/180s@F16, ISO400, camera hand-held, flash in auto-mode and hot-shoe mounted, white reflector

Comment by niblue posted on Weekly Competition No 9 - "WATER" at 04/09/2007 - 15:41

niblue
Quote:
Well, it uses different glass and different coatings. The SMC coatings on Pentax glass are second to none.
True, however even 3rd party coatings are very good these days.

Comment by niblue posted on Tokina 16-50 f2.8 at 04/09/2007 - 18:55

niblue
Quote:
The 12-24 and 10-17, are they allso designed together with Pentax?
Yes.

Comment by niblue posted on Tokina 16-50 f2.8 at 04/09/2007 - 15:43

niblue
Quote:
Leech wrote:

What am I doing wrong ?
You are putting a Tokina lens on a Pentax camera.
So are you, given you've just bought a 16-50 F2.8, even if it does have Pentax badges on...

I've had 3 Tokina ATX-Pro lenses for many years, including the 28-70 F2.6-2.8 and not had compatability problems with any Pentax SLR or D-SLR so far.

In this case it sounds like the issue probably does relate to the electrical contacts between the lens and camera not making a good connection. Check the contacts on the lens to see if the central connector any any of them is depressed further than it should be - I've seen that a couple of times with lenses (including Pentax's own ones).

For the AF problem can you check the focus ring is in the AF position and not MF (the ATX-Pro's are like the FA* Pentax lenses in having a focus ring with two positions so that it doesn't rotate when in AF) - I got my ATX-Pro 20-35mm F2.8 cheap because the person selling it on Ebay though the AF didn't work when it was just because they had the focus ring in the wrong position.

Comment by niblue posted on Tokina AF 28-70 f.2.6-2.8 AT-X 270af Pro II issues ?? at 04/09/2007 - 10:56

niblue
I seem to recall having a Tamron adaptall mount a few years back that was Pentax & Ricoh fitting. It nearly jammed on one of my AF bodies (can't recall which one) but worked fine on the MF ones.

Comment by niblue posted on How to fit a vivitar lens? at 04/09/2007 - 15:51

niblue
Quote:
Clarky wrote:
Quote:
Tyr wrote:
Grrr... As soon as I saw 200mm f4 I was excited. I really want the A version of this lens

I have no idea what it would go for but the A versions are expensive.
You might like this one:

http://tinyurl.com/yr6hn4

G
$1400us for an A version of this lens is this guy kidding or is that what they go for
Clarky,

The Pentax * lenses, along with the Ltds, are amongst the very best lenses on the planet. You don't have to ask how good they are; they are superb.

And quality has a price.

g
Apparently not $1400 US (plus 22% VAT!) though as the lens didn't sell.

Comment by niblue posted on SMC M 200mm f4 sale advice at 04/09/2007 - 17:21

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo