MattMatic

Joined: 2nd July 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

MattMatic
The K-7 is a fine, fine camera

I had no real problems shooting at ISO2500 in RAW and LR3. The K20D performed well at that too. The noise quality is different between them, but certainly not a problem (and 'film like') when printed large.

It's a definite plus having the front and rear dials, and the level of customisation that's available in the K-7

Weatherproofing may help a bit - you don't have to worry so much if you get caught in rain - just hold the lens downwards (I got some lovely shots in heavy snow with the K-7 and non-waterproofed SMC-FA 50/1.4). At least you don't have to worry about the body

I'm sure you'll enjoy the K-7!
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on K7 owners- a few questions? at 04/05/2011 - 12:11

MattMatic
I am utterly blown away by the K-5 IQ - even at high ISO (which I do use all the time up to ISO10,000!). ISO80 in sun with crazy contrast, shooting RAW I have been able to retain highlights and shadows and pull it all under control within LR3.

The extra 2 bits are extremely useful. I'm able to pull truly usable image detail out of deep shadow... and there's almost zero chromatic noise! There is luminance noise, sure, but it's very film like and easily tamed under LR.

Stefan - sure the DR is lower at higher ISO, but I wouldn't trade the extra 2-bits even at the higher ISO

Really - the difference is staggering, and I'm getting spoiled!!
If anyone is driving by the south coast you can drop me a PM and I'll show you a couple of 18"x12" at 402dpi straight from the K-5

Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on K7 owners- a few questions? at 03/05/2011 - 21:25

MattMatic
...just needs the "D" to go with it
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax 645 set-up... at 03/05/2011 - 10:12

MattMatic
You are correct
Your two choices are to use another AF360/540 as controller or master, or, buy an extension cable (there are some third party ones around).

It's because HS sync requires a high frequency pulsed light to 'pepper' the frame with light as the shutter slit moves across the frame.
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on K-7 AF-560 high speed sync off camera at 01/05/2011 - 08:02

MattMatic
Informal shots are usually lovely when without flash and shallow DoF
Definitely don't bother with the tripod
(Though I used the 12-24 held high on a tripod to get a birds eye view of all the guests )
Have fun!!
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Any advice for a wedding? at 28/04/2011 - 20:57

MattMatic
Erm... that's a keychain Ken not a camera
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on eBay triumph!!! at 28/04/2011 - 12:48

MattMatic
Just a minor thing... From initial tests the infrared filter on the K-5 is stronger than the K-7. So not really practical for IR photography.

But the DR increase is increeeeeedible

Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Is the k5 worth buying at 27/04/2011 - 21:46

MattMatic
'Definitely'
Incredible sensor IQ jump from the K-7.
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Is the k5 worth buying at 27/04/2011 - 14:41

MattMatic
Personally, I would learn to use lighting first before spending cash
Even a couple of cheap halogen lights (e.g. Ikea) and some sheets of polystyrene from your local Comet/Curries can be used to great effect!

I've seen professional quality portraits done with nothing but available lighting and kitchen-foil-covered polystyrene.

Once you know the 'how', then you'll be better placed for the 'what' equipment question
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Advice needed for a studio set up please at 27/04/2011 - 12:16

MattMatic
I am very pleased with a Lacie 120
I've found it gives extremely accurate rendition for printing (it is always calibrated of course!)
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on What is the best monitor? at 27/04/2011 - 12:13

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo