johnwhit

Joined: 27th April 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnwhit
johnriley wrote:
Quote:
especially with a fast lens @ f/1.4 because the DoF is very shallow.
I'm going to disagree with that. The faster the lens the easier manual focus is, for two reasons.

One, the image is brighter, so the eye can see better details.

Two, the limited DOF makes the exact point of focus very precise.

I'd agree with those statements, but not if your viewfinder/focusing screen is giving you a very dim image which is the point I'm making, I don't know of anyone in theire right minds who wants a really dim viewfinder

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on To the people who love manual focus... at 19/06/2010 - 12:31

johnwhit
Mike-P wrote:
Going to withdraw this from sale .. after using it a bit today I think I actually like it better than the K-7.

Never thought I would say that
I came to the same conclusion after having a K-7 on loan to me for a week or so, kept the K20D, waiting for the next one to come along. I prefer the ergonomics of the K20D, the 5.2 fps on the K-7 was a very good feature though

Regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on FS: Pentax K20D body at 19/06/2010 - 11:45

johnwhit
Dubious Drewski wrote:
What I want is an accurate focus screen that makes it very easy to see my plane of focus. I don't care how dim the screen is.
With a really dim screen you'll find it virtually imossible to judge sharp focus, especially with a fast lens @ f/1.4 because the DoF is very shallow. Back in the day when I used a Pentax MX I always had a matte screen fitted:

http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/misc/focus/screens/circle.gif

or grid screen to help composition:

http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/misc/focus/screens/circle_grid.gif

I never really liked focusing aids like split prism etc. I use the original screen in the K20D for manual focus without issues. I think the K-7 screen would be every bit as good if not better, being as it's 100% view 0.92x. The perceived difference in DoF you're seeing through the viewfinder is probably due to the magnification offered by the viewfinder and screen but has no effect on actual DoF. Pentax make some of the best viefinders of any affordable DSLR's IMHO, try looking through a Nikon D3000

Regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on To the people who love manual focus... at 19/06/2010 - 11:17

johnwhit
I've never had the opportunity to use one but there's a review here:

http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/323-sigma-af-55-200mm-f4-56-dc-lab-test-report...

and the Pentax DA 50-200 here:

http://www.photozone.de/pentax/138-pentax-smc-da-50-200mm-f4-56-ed-review--test-...

I sold the DA 50-200 I had and bought a Tamron 70-300 LD Di and found it much better.

Regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on thinking of buying this lens at 19/06/2010 - 10:45

johnwhit
Hi Archie,

thanks for the comment, it's roughly the same size as the Sigma as far as I can tell, but the Sigma lacks the bulbous front element and can be used with filters. I'm looking forward to using the Fiseye sometime in the not too distant future

Best regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on LBA kicks in (again) at 18/06/2010 - 20:55

johnwhit
helios wrote:


I doubt if you can do better than the Samyang 8mm for the money - it was a bit cheaper when I bought it. I sometimes regret selling it but realistically I get a lot more use from the Pentax 15mm Ltd not least because it is so small and portable that I usually have it with me when photo opportunities crop up.

On the subject of LBA I am trying to conquer my addiction by resolving to sell an old lens every time I buy a new one. It does not really save money but the quality on my lenses has improved!

Archie
Hi Archie,

Thanks for your comments. I couldn't really justify the Pentax 10-17 price wise, although it's undoubtebly a fine somewhat unique lens. The Samyang really appeals to me, the DA15 and FA31 are on my wishlist, I'd love to own both these very fine lenses. The problem is I have the Sigma 10-20, Pentax FA28/2.8 and FA35/2 so I've basicly got that range covered and can't really justify the purchase of DA15 & FA31
I too have been selling off some of my older lenses as I purchase new but seem to have got to the point where I'm reluctant to let any more go, the replacement for the K-7 may change all that, until then I continue to use the K20D which I really enjoy.

Best regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on LBA kicks in (again) at 18/06/2010 - 19:03

johnwhit
sam-joseph wrote:
I've just realised I have the dreaded LBA, and as much as I fight it, I too want a Samyang 8mm, and a Samyang (Vivitar) 85mm f1.4.
My name is Sam-Joseph, and I have LBA......
Regards
Welcome to the meeting

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on LBA kicks in (again) at 18/06/2010 - 13:44

johnwhit
I wouldn't recommend using a TC with a wide to standard zoom, unless you intend to use it only at the 50mm setting.

Regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on Which tele-convertor? at 18/06/2010 - 13:39

johnwhit
helios wrote:
I had the Falcon version of the Samyang 8mm (it is sold under a variety of names) and it certainly had an "A" setting. It was a good lens but rather bulky and after playing with the fisheye format for a bit I decided to sell it and other stuff to fund the acquisition of a Pentax 15mm Ltd which is small and light enough to go everywhere with me.
That's a good choice, I really like the DA15, but it's a little expensive right now, I don't use Fisheye lenses that often but I've been missing having one for the APS-C format, I think £212 is a reasonable price for a lens that will be used infrequently.

Best regards,

John

Comment by johnwhit posted on LBA kicks in (again) at 18/06/2010 - 07:23

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo