ilovesaabs

Joined: 8th June 2012

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

ilovesaabs
pschlute wrote:
I cannot actually see the lens named in the exif ?

I do know which one it is though.
All it says is 50 mm f1.4, could be any lens.....

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Top Secret! at 08/06/2018 - 23:57

ilovesaabs
In AP's defence. it is more readable than Digital Camera or Practical Pornography these days, even then you don't get as many scantily clad ladies in PP as you used to in the good old days.

I can go from cover to cover with DC and PP in 10-15 minutes, I get a lot more out of AP, and Outdoor Photography is the best for me. Time to rethink my subscriptions I think... especially when the best macro lens for a Pentax according to DC is the Samyang (not having tested the D-FA 100 WR) - maybe they weren't given a lens to test.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Future of Pentax at 05/06/2018 - 13:18

ilovesaabs
Digital camera does a good review of the K-1 Mk2 - not bad for a magazine where Pentax is invisible (just like PP)...

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on K1 Mk 2 review - disappointing to say the least at 04/06/2018 - 18:59

ilovesaabs
Stories about the demise of Pentax have been circulating for as long as I have been taking photos

'slow to adopt AF'
'slow to adopt digital'
'slow to adopt this' 'slow to adopt that'

Pentax might be a very small player in a field where you have big hitters such as Canon and Nikon, yet at the price point Pentax compete at there is hardly anything better.

read some reports and you'll believe Nikon will go to the wall, yet the D500 and D850 are hugely popular.

Pentax will be around for a long time yet. But if the whole concern goes belly up, our cameras will still work.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Future of Pentax at 04/06/2018 - 18:57

ilovesaabs
Kudos for admitting to the fungus issues, sadly it is something that can worsen....Like Mike we have lenses we love but use very sparingly - my Limiteds and FA primes get little use, as do my Nikkor primes (except the 300) and I worry what long term storage does (even when taking precautions).

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on WTB FA* 200 macro at 25/05/2018 - 16:36

ilovesaabs
Fabulous, not a disciple of Doug Chinnery or Valda Bailey are you? I like all of them, but most of all I like 5.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Outer Hebrides - ICM/Multiple Exposures at 25/05/2018 - 16:32

ilovesaabs
Pentaxke wrote:
If you don't ask, you won't know what he asks for it...

What shop did you go to in Tokyo? I did some second hand shops in Tokyo but didn't see anything as exotic as the FA* 200 macro.
I'll have to check my paperwork, my DFA Macro came from Osaka I think - perks of working for a japanese company...

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on WTB FA* 200 macro at 24/05/2018 - 19:12

ilovesaabs
I guess he will hold out for >€2500 as it is a wanted lens. If money was no object I'd bid that much and go and collect it.

Alternatively, look for deals for flights to Tokyo. When I went the shop I got my FA77Ltd from was very well stocked with FA* glass.

Cost of shipment and insurance will be an important factor (unless Fred happens to live in North Holland), hence the Tokyo suggestion

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on WTB FA* 200 macro at 24/05/2018 - 12:25

ilovesaabs
Another vote of confidence for Pramath at Brentford.

It will cost £150 or thereabouts to get it repaired but he does check the motors before fitment as he told me that he has received faulty batches which he returned. All lenses checked and returned. Fixed my FA*28-70 too.,...

There are ways to convert the lens to screwdrive, but seeing as fully functioning lenses fetch around £350-400 nowadays you wonder whether it is worth the while getting the lens repaired with a worry it will go kaput again but balance that againt knowing you have a defective lens already.......... I spent the £150.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on To repair or not to repair? at 23/05/2018 - 22:06

ilovesaabs
bforbes wrote:
Both the Sigma and Tamron were designed for crop sensors. That's not to say they would not work on FF, but the images will need some PP. I'd add the Sigma 17-35 EX DG to HarisF1's suggestions, but it is a little heavier the FA 18-35. 425g compared to 280g. Don't forget the 1.5x conversion of Crop sensors when considering what is wide angle on full frame.

Taken with the sigma 17-35/K1Comment Image
straight from the camera
pssst I already mentioned the Sigma 17-35 on page 1. I pondered over this when getting the *ist D but ended up with the 15-30 EX.....however wasn't long before I got the DA*16-50, so it didn't get much use.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Wide options for the K1 at 23/05/2018 - 22:02

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo