ilovesaabs

Joined: 8th June 2012

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

ilovesaabs
I say get the FA*28-70 and watch the Canon shooters twitch - they cannot comprehend another brand having silver lens bodies....

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Standard zoom options for the K1 at 23/05/2018 - 21:58

ilovesaabs
Did you buy it? no longer available....

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Twin Flash for Macro? at 23/05/2018 - 21:56

ilovesaabs
F A B U L O U S!

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Mistle Thrush Latest. at 18/05/2018 - 12:45

ilovesaabs
I'd give Cambrian photography in Colwyn Bay a shout - sometimes they have a good selection of used lenses - prices are reasonable.

I've used the FA*28-70 on mine and had no problems with it at all.... Just a pain when using Lee Filters due to the rotating front element.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Standard zoom options for the K1 at 15/05/2018 - 13:16

ilovesaabs
redbusa99 wrote:
Triumph engines for years, GM engines later. they have had all sorts
The Triumph engine was probably the shortest lived collaboration - the 2.0 litre was very different to the 1.7 and 1.85s that were shared with the Dolomite.....Scania took on the engineering from the early 1970s - without that there would've been no Turbo.

Don't forget.....

Fiat - for the later diesels
Isuzu for the V6 diesel

Before the whole concern went bankrupt, the plan was to use BMW engines to replace the GM units....

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on For Peter (Ilovesaabs) at 13/05/2018 - 00:05

ilovesaabs
K10D wrote:
Mike-P wrote:
Sort of tempted to buy a Nikon D500 and a 200-500mm to see how that compares but if I do then I'm going to have to start getting rid of something very soon after.
With all respect Mike, don't consider the 200-500mm.

I'd look at a Sigma 500mm on a K5 IIs first. The lens will shift to another Pentax user if you go to a D500 and even then, I'd get another Sigma 500mm for the Nikon over the 200-500mm

Best regards
I think you're alone in this regard.... The Nikkor 200-500 seems to have a better reputation than the 80-400 (new one) and the 200-400 f4. A fast prime, although a much better bet, is at least 3-4x more expensive than the 200-500 (or 150-450 at the 'special' price - I really hope I haven't missed the boat with the special offers...)

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Please forgive my transgression at 13/05/2018 - 00:00

ilovesaabs
vic cross wrote:
Algi. They're Swedish.
Vic.
Considering most of the cars were 96 or 95 V4s - these (and the gorgeous red Sonnet) are powered by the Ford Cologne V4 from the Taunus 12M

The stub nose 95/96 and the red 92B are powered by a two-stroke engine designed by DKW (what eventually became today's Audi).

The MCY 900 Turbo 16S Cabrio - built in Finland (as might some of the 96s)

The upside down 96 - I thought that was a tribute to the rally driver Eric Carlsson.

Cheers Vic

My Dad had 13 Saabs altogether - I am on my 4th - the new generation 9-5, I love it.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on For Peter (Ilovesaabs) at 12/05/2018 - 11:48

ilovesaabs
Extreme Pro or equivalent. I am a bit blase about card unless both cards fail simultaneously.

Sandisk Extreme Pro 32mb 95 mb/sec are insanely cheap these days, I paid £15-20 for the last ones I bought at Focus/Societies. Even on K-1 it takes a long time to fill slot 1 with RAWS.

I always shoot RAW slot 1 JPEG slot 2.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on SD card recommendations at 10/05/2018 - 23:44

ilovesaabs
cardiffgareth wrote:
Is this the ATX version, MK1 or MK2? Asking as reading the reviews it says the earlier versions had a rotating front element and the later didn't!

Any pics would be welcome to see the beast!
That's old tech for you taking a set of Lee Filters on holidays with K-1 and FA*28-70 was highly entertaining an ultimately frustrating experience.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on FS: Tokina AF 20-35 f3.5-4.5 - Excellent at 10/05/2018 - 23:39

ilovesaabs
Sigma 15-30 or 17-35 maybe? I had the 15-30 and it is much smaller and lighter than the D-FA (although I sold the Sigma about 10 years ago when I was having a clearout of lenses as I had so much overlap). At one time I owned 15-30, 24-70, 20, 70-200 and 100-300 plus F35-70, FA24-90. Until 2 years ago I owned only DA*16-50 and DA*60-250 plus a lot of FA/FA* primes 24, 31, 35, 43, 50 (2), 77, 85, 100, 135, 300.

Like othe Peter, I stupidly regret selling the FA24-90.

But I would check out the superwide Sigma zooms, or persevere with the crop mode until the time comes you can afford the D-FAs.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Wide options for the K1 at 10/05/2018 - 23:36

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo