PLUS

davidtrout

Joined: 22nd July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

davidtrout
Darkmunk wrote:
I'm feeling boisterous.
Should the gallery be renamed to:
"Area for lame photos and monotonous, sycophantic comments" ?
It would be really nice to be able to go to the gallery for inspiration but it seems to be a place for relentless back-slapping or just somewhere easy to post test images... what's wrong with the photo critique area?
Can we have another gallery now please? and maybe call this one "keepers"

Seriously tho' we have enough talent here to have a truly exceptional portfolio, vetted in some way, but please - no voting, otherwise it will turn into a clique
I've always understood the Gallery was a place for photo critique. Isn't that why there's a box for comments? If the more critical of our members feel the need to express opinions its up to them to do so. There seems to be some sort of exclusive clique involved in commenting in the more difficult to access Forum which certain people consider to be in some way superior to the Gallery. I'm sorry Mike says he's deleted his images, which I enjoy, from the Gllery.
david.

Comment by davidtrout posted on new name for the gallery at 22/02/2009 - 22:26

davidtrout
Winners get an automatic PM a soon as they are selected.
david
PS that was John Riley's 4999th post. Go for the 5,000th John.

Comment by davidtrout posted on Weekly Competition # 84: A Face at 17/02/2009 - 19:58

davidtrout
First class achievement Ken.
david

Comment by davidtrout posted on Chuffed to bit's! at 17/02/2009 - 19:55

davidtrout
The EXIF info in my case is always inaccurate. It invariably states that my pictures are shot in shutter priority mode whereas I always shoot aperture priority. The shutter speed often indicates some obscure mathematical concoction such as 8000th of a millionth of a second or some other mystical figure.
Since I started shooting everything in RAW and then converting to TIFF for the final image much of the data is missing in the published EXIF.
When I posted a picture which was scanned from a slide the EXIF said the camera used was a Nikon. In fact it was a Nikon scanner.
david

Comment by davidtrout posted on Exif data at 17/02/2009 - 10:03

davidtrout
No. 2 for me, its very artistic. I'm not generally a fan of HDR as many photographers get carried away and produce OTT results but your No.2 is restrained yet goes far enough to achieve the right result.
david

Comment by davidtrout posted on Thought I'd have a stab at a sunset ! at 16/02/2009 - 17:02

davidtrout
Although you've improved the detail Ted I'm not convinced this is better, the first shot had more 'bite' with the darker blue giving it drama.
david

Comment by davidtrout posted on Wallasey docks at dawn at 16/02/2009 - 09:12

davidtrout
All three pictures are stunning but the rhino is my No.1 too Emily. It must be just about the best rhino pic I've seen.
Like Terry says, I never use the multiple focus selection points and shoot only on centre spot focusing. Its easy to snap into focus with it and, holding the botton down half way to lock, recompose the picture before snapping. It becomes second nature after a while, especially as that's what I used to do when I worked with manual focus cameras.
If you were shooting through wire mesh fences would that account for the amount of hunting your lens did on auto?
david
PS I said I focussed this way with manual focus cameras. Should have said with auto focus film camera, the Z1 which I used before I got digitalised.

Comment by davidtrout posted on zoo trip with my new lens at 15/02/2009 - 19:18

davidtrout
I see a couple of members entered their own faces (you look good Emily). My entry is positively not a self portrait.
david

Comment by davidtrout posted on Weekly Competition # 84: A Face at 13/02/2009 - 17:52

davidtrout
All this confirms my opinion that the best way to post photos is in the Gallery. Friends can comment on them there if they wish. Its so easy, no fuss.
david

Comment by davidtrout posted on Posting photos at 13/02/2009 - 16:14

davidtrout
I had a new MX which I bought in the early 1980s soon after they were introduced. It was a lovely little camera and for it's time very technically advanced. It never let me down. I still regard it as a classic.
david

Comment by davidtrout posted on A praise for the MX at 11/02/2009 - 09:11

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo