All Forum Comments
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Explanation please. at 19/02/2010 - 15:35
Also is there a rule of thumb as to how much one should crop? Or is it personal preference?
This is a 100% crop from a K10D with DA*300mm.

Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Explanation please. at 19/02/2010 - 14:56
Hi Dan - enlighten an old fella please
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on More coloured KXs coming... at 16/02/2010 - 23:34
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Discussion for Weekly Competition # 137 - "Wood" at 15/02/2010 - 23:15
If you get it, it's all fair and square and above board. If someone outbids you, then the owner's happy because it went for more than you thought it would.
Make sense?
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on eBay items at 15/02/2010 - 22:44
Leave the serious photographers with their pride and dignity and belief in a once world leading/beating company which should not need gimmicks like this.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on More coloured KXs coming... at 15/02/2010 - 22:38
For aircraft in flight, the K10's AF is more than adequate. For birds, I really don't think it is.
Obviously it depends on the birds and the situation, but I wouldn't necessarily write the K10D off for bird pics.
I've had a number of occasions recently which have pointed out to me that Canon's AF system needs as much input from the photographer as any other system.
Several weeks ago I was doing a tuition day in a camera shop, and had two separate people (one with a 40D, one with a 50D) ask me "why are so many of my shots out of focus?".
An acquaintance of mine recently got herself a 50D, popped out to take some shots to show me, and half of them were woefully out of focus (and when I tried it, it seemed to want to focus on anything but what I was pointing it at, although admittedly that was using auto focus point selection).
Finally, I was giving tuition to someone with a 1D mk2 and was shocked when it was focusing on things in several steps, as in: focus a bit, stop, focus a bit, stop, focus a bit, stop, focus a bit (nearly there by now!), stop, focus a bit - focused! That was with a Tamron zoom, but even so...
I'm not saying these people wouldn't get different results from any other camera, just that the idea of Canon's AF system being foolproof, or some sort of holy grail, is clearly a myth.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Slow AF? at 14/02/2010 - 14:17
I was sure I'd seen issues where there was blur for no apparent reason; 2s delay, no-one near the tripod and such like but still blur. Hmm.....
Bret
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Downsides to Shake Reduction at 13/02/2010 - 21:09
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on a few close ups at 13/02/2010 - 20:33
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on You're invited to an evening in London 19 March at 12/02/2010 - 18:36


Dan's example above is exceptional. So good I can hardly believe it is 100%.
Taken from this thread.
Dan