PLUS

womble

Joined: 11th September 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

womble
I have been reading variations on this thread ever since I joined the forum five years ago. K.

Comment by womble posted on New K3 image - interesting! at 06/10/2013 - 10:46

womble
I know that Andrew feels the same way about his K10D and thus keeps that for good light situations. It could explain, it part, my drift away from the K20D to using Ektar 100 film!

K.

Comment by womble posted on CCD vs CMOS at 04/10/2013 - 17:17

womble
Peter Elgar wrote:
I bet even THAT one suffers from the LX 'Sticky Mirror' syndrome -- reason why I don't use mine much now !
Send it to Harrow Technical, it isn't a difficult fix.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Gold Spotmatic at 03/10/2013 - 19:54

womble
Mongoose wrote:
thanks John, my wording was unclear, let me try again:

The film is rated at 200ISO. The camera is calibrated for 100 or 400 and has no exposure compensation.

given that it is colour negative film, am I correct in assuming that it will perform better overexposed by one stop by setting the camera to 100, than it will under exposed by one stop by setting the camera to 400?
The Auto 110 Super did have some exposure compensation I believe? Not very common though.

I once shot a roll of Kodachrome 64 through a normal Pentax 110. It was a disaster as underexposing slide film by at least 2/3rds of a stop -- usually more because you couldn't account for the skies either -- led to very dark images indeed.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Film for 110 cameras at 02/10/2013 - 22:17

womble
It is possibly the dreaded dodgy plastic cog problem that was the Achilles heel of the MZ series. It is possible to get it replaced with a good brass one but at a cost so it depends on how much you value the camera (rather than how much the camera is 'worth' commercially).

K.

Comment by womble posted on Advice please on MZ3 at 02/10/2013 - 22:08

womble
johnha wrote:
womble wrote:
I'm still trying to make up my mind between a new dslr or a Pentax 67. At the moment the 67 is winning...
Hi Kris,

Horses for courses as I'm sure you'll appreciate. I bought my 67 a few months ago, but you might also have to budget for a bigger bag too!

The results on film are spectacular but trying to find affordable scanning that shows them off to their best is somewhat harder...

John.
That's what my Epson V750 is for, not that I have taken it of the box yet...!

Comment by womble posted on Pentax Full Frame Comment at 01/10/2013 - 12:21

womble
I'm still trying to make up my mind between a new dslr or a Pentax 67. At the moment the 67 is winning...

Comment by womble posted on Pentax Full Frame Comment at 30/09/2013 - 12:45

womble
ronniemac wrote:
Stuey wrote:
You have to listed to someone who so closely resembles a university lecturer
Perhaps a little unfair on my occupation? but I admire your staying power.

After 10 seconds I decided to remain blissfully unaware of this f.f. vs. crop sensor explanation.

Smeggypants wrote:
"more detail per pixel" - ROFLMAO. What a stupid thing to say!!!
I made a good decision then.
Mine too although I'll hold my hand up to the beard and glasses....

Comment by womble posted on Pentax Full Frame Comment at 30/09/2013 - 11:46

womble
Works better cropped square or 5x4. As it is there is too much tarmac which detracts from any etherality (I think I made that word up...!).

Comment by womble posted on Haze at 29/09/2013 - 19:11

womble
PM sent.

Comment by womble posted on FS: SMC Pentax 1:2.8 30mm (excellent) at 29/09/2013 - 18:24

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo