All Forum Comments
Comment by womble posted on Yet more K-3 v. K-5mkii questions at 22/11/2013 - 07:54
K.
Comment by womble posted on Wobbly LX viewfinder at 21/11/2013 - 23:57
Comment by womble posted on Where to sell my Pentax lenses at 21/11/2013 - 22:35
K.
Comment by womble posted on Wobbly LX viewfinder at 21/11/2013 - 20:40
Enjoy the LX, it is a lovely camera. K.
Comment by womble posted on Wobbly LX viewfinder at 21/11/2013 - 18:09
K.
Comment by womble posted on I know nothing about photography but I've bought an LX. Help! at 21/11/2013 - 18:06
K.
Comment by womble posted on I know nothing about photography but I've bought an LX. Help! at 21/11/2013 - 17:28
K.
Comment by womble posted on Where to sell my Pentax lenses at 18/11/2013 - 07:12
Thoughts and advice gratefully accepted. I could get 200 rolls of Kodak Ektar for the cost of a K-3 body so I'm not going to jump too quickly!
Comment by womble posted on Yet more K-3 v. K-5mkii questions at 16/11/2013 - 22:31
I have long been less-than-happy with my K20D and have been planning to buy a newer dSLR. Some bug in the credit card address system prevented me from buying the K-5mkii in March before my round-the-world trip. Now I have the choice between the K-3 and the K-5mkii.
Although the temptation of the newest, shiniest, toy on the block is great, I am unsure that for my requirements (please note the emphasis) that the K-3 is much of an advantage over the K-5mkii. The sorts of things I have in mind are:
a) I use a great deal of "legacy" glass, i.e., more often that not I am using K or M series glass, occasionally A series, and sometimes M42 Takumars. How do the K3 and K5 compare in accuracy of metering with legacy glass (the K20D sucks) and how easy is manual focus? I know the K-3 has "focus peeking" in live view, but I don't know if the K-5 does. I'm not generally a fan of live view preferring to use the viewfinder on most occasions.
b) What is the IQ like using legacy glass? Are there differences in things like abberations? I'm wondering if the more tightly packed photosites in the K-3 sensor might actually make those sorts of issues worse rather than better.
c) There has been a lot of talk about focusing on moving things, but what, in general terms, are they like to use on more static subjects such as landscapes and architecture. Much of a muchness?
d) Has anyone tried the FLU card? One of the main things that interests me is being able to use that sort of technology. Can the K-5mkii be used tethered? I do a fair amount of technical work on a copystand and being able to check focus, lighting etc. and download images immediately would be very helpful.
Thoughts and advice gratefully accepted. I could get 200 rolls of Kodak Ektar for the cost of a K-3 body so I'm not going to jump too quickly!
Best wishes, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on Yet more K-3 v. K-5mkii questions at 16/11/2013 - 13:31


[quote:3496ace15f="womble"]
d) Has anyone tried the FLU card? One of the main things that interests me is being able to use that sort of technology. Can the K-5mkii be used tethered? I do a fair amount of technical work on a copystand and being able to check focus, lighting etc. and download images immediately would be very helpful.
Cheers Kris.