All Forum Comments
Comment by pgweber posted on 50-200 vs 55-300 at 22/10/2010 - 16:38
Comment by pgweber posted on K5 Price? at 06/10/2010 - 18:35
Any word on whether these new lenses will be compatible with the existing SDM bodies? IIRC the current system uses an AC supply from the body contacts?
http://www.pentax.co.uk/en/group/14/product/21977/body/specifications/Photo_Lens...
Is this the answer to your question?
"* This lens is compatible with the PENTAX K-5, K-r, K-7, K-x, K-m, K2000, K20D, K200D, K100D Super and K10D (with firmware v. 1.30 or above installed). When mounted on other camera bodies, the focus mode is automatically switched to manual."
Comment by pgweber posted on New sdm = dc (see patent) at 21/09/2010 - 21:47
I like the panned shot, not quite 10/10 but it shows nicely the profile of the engine and I enjoy the way the exhaust is drawn out by the speed.
Good to see her working hard in the last shot too.
Regards
Comment by pgweber posted on Duchess on Tour at 19/09/2010 - 12:52
I had no issues with SDHC cards, but followed the logic that there might have been other small enhancements (unpublicised) in the newest firmware.
Got a shoot planned for tomorrow, so might try out the text file afterwards.
Regards
Comment by pgweber posted on K10D Back focusing Issue at 10/09/2010 - 18:47
The original Russian software doesn't work properly in Windows 7, and the MODSET.TXT doesn't seem to work in firmware 1.31.
my problem was that i didn't left the SD card door open and remember that after the text you must press enter since there must be a new rule to finish the sentence.
My K10D is on v1.31 so do I need to "retro-install" v1.30 to use the Russian (or preferrably 'English' Pentax-Hack) Debug Mode invoker?
Peter
Comment by pgweber posted on K10D Back focusing Issue at 10/09/2010 - 18:03
Thanks in advance,
Peter
Comment by pgweber posted on Finally calibrated my K10D's AF at 10/09/2010 - 16:55
I like the head-on/compressed view for the sense of power and I always enjoy a firework display.
Comment by pgweber posted on No smokeless zone here at 03/08/2010 - 21:13
Comment by pgweber posted on Angel of the North at 03/08/2010 - 21:09
I agree with you Matt, about the feel of the lens. It is quite plasticky and almost feels like something will drop off. Zoom and focus rings are a bit sloppy but that could be down to wear and tear. A few quick shots out of the window seem to yield very acceptable colour rendition, as you say.
HG, I actually bought it at a camera shop in town. The lens was sitting next to a ticket marked "Pentax MZ50 + 28-90 £39.99". The body had gone which I did not want anyway, so I asked how much for the lens. They split it in half, i.e. £20. I would have thought the lenses were more sought after and could command a larger proportion of the ticket price, so I was quite happy.
Regards
Comment by pgweber posted on Pentax FA 28-90mm f3.5 at 03/08/2010 - 21:04


I wondered if any of you have owned an original 50-200 which you have upgraded to the 55-300? Were you pleased that you did and what were the greatest benefits/improvements?
I have a Samsung 50-200 which I have always been pleased with, so what extra will the 55-300 give me?
Regards