petrochemist

Joined: 27th February 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

petrochemist
I'm pretty sure I've downloaded a trial of Hugin in the past, but I found ICE much easier to use!

Comment by petrochemist posted on Which photo stitching programme is best please? at 01/06/2016 - 18:17

petrochemist
Unconverted the K100d works better than the K7, but that's because of it's weak hot mirror. Conversion removes the hot mirror so the K7 would be significantly better.

It is possible to focus without the filter on & shift as required for the change in focus. It's not too awkward with many older lenses (which have IR marks) but LV is all round easier.

Comment by petrochemist posted on IR conversion - K100D Super or K7 at 28/05/2016 - 06:35

petrochemist
There is this one http://www.ebooks4cameras.com/Pentax-K-30-e-book-K-30.htm
I had his book on the K100d which was a great improvement on the manual. Never got the versions for my later cameras though.

Comment by petrochemist posted on Ebooks4pentax at 12/05/2016 - 17:24

petrochemist
davidwozhere wrote:
If you see one, buy it (but do note that there is also a plain vanilla 28mm as well)
Unfortunately the one I've had for ~30 years is only the plain version. It got used a lot when I was shooting film.

Comment by petrochemist posted on Miranda f2.8 MC macro at 03/05/2016 - 12:13

petrochemist
Jonathan-Mac wrote:
A 24mm for 18 quid? I'd have gone for that, not sure about the others.
+1
I've no shortage of lenses covering the 70-210 range so I'd not even have given them a second look, but I know a Pentax user in the market for a cheapish macro.
My Miranda 24mm/2.8 works adequately (and was only £5) though it has a Ricoh pin, it's smooth enough not to cause issues,

Comment by petrochemist posted on Miranda 24mm f2.8 mc macro at 03/05/2016 - 12:10

petrochemist
redbusa99 wrote:
you take a shot of your nice green lawn in bright sunlight, without the filter, then use that image to set the WB then attach the filter to take the IR shot. You get blue skies by swapping the blue and red colour channels. there are some good tutorials on youtube on using an R72 filter.
I've heard of people using converted cameras getting pleasing results doing a CWB without the filter, but with the filter is far more common.
FWIW paper, grey card, PTFE, concrete & the sky have all been used for IR CWB of one sort or another, giving different results but all perfectly legitimate.
If your using an unmodified camera a CWB without the filter will be TOTALLY useless, the visible light seen during CWB would swamp any trace IR signal which is all that will be used for the image.

From the exposure times Derek is getting his K3 is unmodified. Doing a channel swap with a R72 & unmodified camera will give you everything blue, as over 99% of the trace infrared normal cameras can see is recorded in the red channel. Using filters below 720nm on unmodified cameras generally just record the visible portion that the filter transmits with no IR being visible.

Comment by petrochemist posted on Infrared white balance on K3 at 28/04/2016 - 13:57

petrochemist
pgweber wrote:

They seem to have invented a category so that each brand can win a prize!
You could be right as there's a 'Best Premium Camera' that separate from Professional DSLRs/Mirrorless. Perhaps Premium means overpriced/snob value in this case

Comment by petrochemist posted on K-1 in Glasgow at 20/04/2016 - 11:06

petrochemist
I'd not noticed before but does anyone have any ideas why the 'K-m White' needs a different manual to the other K-m models??

Comment by petrochemist posted on K-1 Operation Manual Available to download at 19/04/2016 - 11:10

petrochemist
If you want low light performance the K5 is a big improvement on the K7, but if the K7 is sufficient for you mines currently available for £130 body only (thanks To George tempting me with his K5-II).
I'm in no rush to sell though having a spare body in the draw at work is proving useful

Comment by petrochemist posted on *istD comparable to? at 15/04/2016 - 14:08

petrochemist
bwlchmawr wrote:
Spring for another six weeks..
Only if you believe the Met Office.
Until the Met office revised their description of spring it was always officially the period from the Spring Equinox to the Summer Solstice (both dates determined by the way the earth moves round the sun rather than an arbitrary calendar).
With this truer definition of spring Pentax have got about 10 weeks, before they can be accused on failing to meet their Spring release.

Comment by petrochemist posted on typical pentax at 13/04/2016 - 22:51

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo