Miranda f2.8 MC macro


melness

Link Posted 29/04/2016 - 18:15
Found this lens in a charity shop for a tenner .

What's your thought on sharpness of this lens .

Sean

1


2


3

Thanks
Sean

McGregNi

Link Posted 29/04/2016 - 18:47
Having said it wasn't worth bothering with on your other thread, it looks to have rendered nicely here .... I'd say your F4.0 shot looks best and would probably take a bit more sharpening at a small radius. It the lens works well then why not ?
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver

melness

Link Posted 29/04/2016 - 19:42
It's worth the tenner i paid for it i think .
Thanks
Sean

davidwozhere

Link Posted 29/04/2016 - 23:57
This is one of the "overlooked" oldies. It will consistently produce excellent results and will focus very close indeed (considering it isn't a dedicated macro lens)
If you see one, buy it (but do note that there is also a plain vanilla 28mm as well)
Both the *istDS and the K5 are incurably addicted to old glass

My page on Photocrowd - link

petrochemist

Link Posted 03/05/2016 - 12:13
davidwozhere wrote:
If you see one, buy it (but do note that there is also a plain vanilla 28mm as well)

Unfortunately the one I've had for ~30 years is only the plain version. It got used a lot when I was shooting film.
Mike
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.

.[size=11:].Flickr WPF Panoramio

JAK

Link Posted 03/05/2016 - 14:35
Any reason the exif shows them all to be taken at 1/15th @ f2.8 and is it actually a 24mm lens?

Camera Maker: PENTAX
Camera Model: PENTAX K20D
Image Date: 2016-04-29 16:40:10 (no TZ)
Focal Length: 24mm (35mm equivalent: 36mm)
Aperture: /2.8
Exposure Time: 0.067 s (1/15)
ISO equiv: 100
Exposure Bias: +0.50 EV
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Manual
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Color Space: sRGB
GPS Coordinate: undefined, undefined
Software: K20D Ver 1.03

If they had been taken at different apertures the depth of field would have changed, whereas these all look the same!
John K
Last Edited by JAK on 03/05/2016 - 14:43
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.