Miranda f2.8 MC macro

melness
Posted 29/04/2016 - 18:15 Link
Found this lens in a charity shop for a tenner .

What's your thought on sharpness of this lens .

Sean

1 Comment Image


2 Comment Image


3 Comment Image
Thanks
Sean
McGregNi
Posted 29/04/2016 - 18:47 Link
Having said it wasn't worth bothering with on your other thread, it looks to have rendered nicely here .... I'd say your F4.0 shot looks best and would probably take a bit more sharpening at a small radius. It the lens works well then why not ?
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
melness
Posted 29/04/2016 - 19:42 Link
It's worth the tenner i paid for it i think .
Thanks
Sean
davidwozhere
Posted 29/04/2016 - 23:57 Link
This is one of the "overlooked" oldies. It will consistently produce excellent results and will focus very close indeed (considering it isn't a dedicated macro lens)
If you see one, buy it (but do note that there is also a plain vanilla 28mm as well)
Both the *istDS and the K5 are incurably addicted to old glass

My page on Photocrowd
petrochemist
Posted 03/05/2016 - 12:13 Link
davidwozhere wrote:
If you see one, buy it (but do note that there is also a plain vanilla 28mm as well)
Unfortunately the one I've had for ~30 years is only the plain version. It got used a lot when I was shooting film.
Mike
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.

.[size=11:].Flickr• WPF• Panoramio
JAK
Posted 03/05/2016 - 14:35 Link
Any reason the exif shows them all to be taken at 1/15th @ f2.8 and is it actually a 24mm lens?

Camera Maker: PENTAX
Camera Model: PENTAX K20D
Image Date: 2016-04-29 16:40:10 (no TZ)
Focal Length: 24mm (35mm equivalent: 36mm)
Aperture: ƒ/2.8
Exposure Time: 0.067 s (1/15)
ISO equiv: 100
Exposure Bias: +0.50 EV
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Manual
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Color Space: sRGB
GPS Coordinate: undefined, undefined
Software: K20D Ver 1.03

If they had been taken at different apertures the depth of field would have changed, whereas these all look the same!
John K
Edited by JAK: 03/05/2016 - 14:43

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo