All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pictures Of A New Model (girl) at 07/06/2007 - 17:24
It'll require back-to-base and a charged repair (which is probably more than the camera is worth).
There's been a thread or two on this subject which I could dig out...
(but I can't take any responsibility for trying it as it's a delicate job, and not for the feint-hearted!)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Optio 60 Accident at 04/06/2007 - 16:56
If you're new to tone curves and some of the other odds and ends within your RAW processor, then it is a lot easier to use dSLR on the JPG output from the RAW.
Also, the actions are by no means simple and will often do things that a RAW converter simply doesn't do.
I paid the $15 when I shot a whole event in JPG (DOH!) and underexposed. The $15 more than paid for itself
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Can any one explain..... at 05/06/2007 - 17:01
It's called "purple fringing" and is pretty easy to get rid of - especially in this case. I would plump for this "quick'n'dirty" method in Photoshop:
* Add a new layer
* Set the layer blend mode to "color"
* Pick a small, soft brush and Alt-click to pick the "neutral" color you want and paint over the purple
As it's a pupil you could do the same by desaturating the color - add a hue/sat adjustment layer, sat to -100, then fill the mask with black. Then paint soft white where you don't want the purple.
There are also some automated methods. "dSLR Tools" has an action for just that
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Can any one explain..... at 04/06/2007 - 14:45
EDIT: And the 50mm f/1.4 too
Nice
It's really comfortable and very easy to use. A snip for £41 including postage from Tecno
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Is Lowepro Slingshot really that good? at 16/06/2007 - 10:08
Not sure you'll get two bodies and lenses in the Slingshot 200
Mine arrived this morning. Feels very nice and comfortable with great features. A little unsure how I'll arrange it - my main observation is that I really want access to a lens or two from the side (ie in the swing-round position). The existing velcro dividers seem to only allow access when you take the thing off your back...
...need to experiment
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Is Lowepro Slingshot really that good? at 15/06/2007 - 14:12
I just picked up a Slingshot 200 for £37 from Tecno
Here's a link to the Slingshot 200 : http://tinyurl.com/2ecz9r
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Is Lowepro Slingshot really that good? at 13/06/2007 - 15:34
http://www.ephotozine.com/article/20-cashback-at-Lowepro
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Is Lowepro Slingshot really that good? at 04/06/2007 - 14:47
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Mac Owners are smart people. at 07/06/2007 - 21:31
you've got your choice of thousands of apps that don't work
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Mac Owners are smart people. at 07/06/2007 - 13:22


Can we calm down please??
As a moderator I would like to re-issue my statement that 600 pixels in either direction is more than fair for in-line images. This will give a good viewing experience for ALL, whether on old displays or modem links.
Anything above that size should be linked (not inline).
PLEASE!
Matt