All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax 645D Release Date at 22/09/2009 - 12:47
I'd risk my 16-50 in a light drizzle, but not in pouring rain.
Not a problem. Just dried it with a towel, then left it out to dry out naturally.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on DA*16-50mm suitable for landscapes? at 22/09/2009 - 12:39
You can set it up to do batches of slides and negs. I did thousands that way while working on other things (just feeding the scanner).
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Nothing suitable from Pentax, so I've gone Nikon at 22/09/2009 - 09:55
I don't have any experience with the Sigma.
(If you're working in that range, then the old Pentax FA 24-90 is rather a lovely lens. Very light and compact with beautiful rendering.)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Sigma 17-70 Ordered at 18/09/2009 - 13:52
My view - it's a gem
(Only tiny little snag is that it's SDM only and won't work on the screw-drive-only cameras like the *ist-D).
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Sigma 17-70 Ordered at 18/09/2009 - 12:33
(Watch out they don't start breeding :lol
Use the dust mapping feature to show where they are, and how big.
Try the sensor clean function.
If that fails, a Rocket Blower normally does the trick.
Realistically dust is always going to be a problem. However, I've found the K20D much, much better at handling dust than the *ist-D (which needed wet cleaning all the time).
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on New Camera and blotches on images grr at 18/09/2009 - 12:32
The early versions didn't support SDM focussing.
(Hold down the MENU button while turning on the power to check)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax Focusing at 17/09/2009 - 21:56
Enamel or embroidered badge for me... or perhaps "wearables" (T-shirt, hat, etc)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax User Badge Poll at 14/09/2009 - 16:28
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/magazine/8253915.stm
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Consumer laws in the UK at 14/09/2009 - 15:41


These issues have plagued 5D users already
One design (think it was Leica) correct it by adjusting the microlens array that sits on top of the CCD. The microlenses on the edges are slightly offset to compensate for the angle of incidence.
Even the K20D reportedly improved things by semiconductor changes to the CMOS sensor. The photosites were positioned closer to the surface so the "pits" were not as deep as other sensors.
So, yes, it's a problem. And yes, it can be worked around.
And yes, it costs money
Matt