Mannesty

Joined: 17th February 2005

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mannesty
Don't start throwing money at your system James, not until you've added up the cost of all of your planned upgrades. Chances are, a new machine with Windows 7 64 bit could be cheaper in the long run.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Photoshop running slow at 21/07/2010 - 14:39

Mannesty
Curious. I bought a very similar unit from Wilkinsons to light my shed, and only £3.99.

To save you counting them all, there are 48 LED's, the same as the Rotolight. No colour correction filters of course.

The black button is the power switch which cycles the lamp pattern from Off > Outer ring only > Inner ring only > both rings > Off.

Comment Image

Comment by Mannesty posted on LED on-camera lighting systems at 21/07/2010 - 10:18

Mannesty
Well I think the noise reduction process has worked, but the remaining processing has given the image a 'paint by numbers' quality.

As an example, compare the dancer's left arm in your version to mine. I accept that mine doesn't have very good skin tone, but there is much more gradation of colours than in yours.

Good attempt though, and I hope you enjoyed playing.

I think this exercise cements the notion that Adobe Lightroom 3 is a really excellent package.

Thanks to Mike for posting the thread and I hope you don't mind this diversion.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Lightroom 3.0 Noise Reduction. at 21/07/2010 - 08:55

Mannesty
Don wrote:
carrying the logic into other areas of life:

I'm constipated. Clearly it is my toilets fault, so I will sell all the "American Standard" toilets in my home and buy "Aquaware"
Comment Image


"American Standard" is crap.
So who wants to buy some "American Standard" toilets, these are beautiful, hardly used in mint condition....
$200.00 each or best offer.
Sorry Don, you can't sell that here, it's not Pentax branded.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Why ?. at 20/07/2010 - 23:26

Mannesty
Excellent series Pedro, and a K10D at ISO 1600 too. Well done.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Women's football in the mud at 20/07/2010 - 22:50

Mannesty
Messing about last night with K20D, DA* 300mm, SMCP-F 1.7x AF Adapter. Processed in Lightroom 3 and Photoshop CS5.

Comment Image

Comment by Mannesty posted on YAMS - (Yet Another Moon Shot) at 20/07/2010 - 09:21

Mannesty
Offertonhatter wrote:
Thanks for the explanation of the TC. Indeed I am going to have to lookout for one of these in second hand places as it is an intriguiging piece of kit to have for my MF lenses.
The TC I mention works with most manual focus lenses, but not all. The lenses that can't use it are listed in its manual. One lens I had that wouldn't work with it was the 135-600mm zoom. I think there are one or two of the older, more exotic, primes that it won't work with either.

Comment by Mannesty posted on K7 First steps... at 19/07/2010 - 18:08

Mannesty
It's a duff'un, send it back for replacement, not repair. Vertical banding has been an issue to varying degrees with just about every Pentax DSLR, and other makes also.

The problem is most pronounced in low light, longer shutter speed situations where you get some really dark areas in the frame. I try to avoid these situations as much as I can.

Comment by Mannesty posted on PROBLEMS WITH K 7 at 19/07/2010 - 15:11

Mannesty
Offertonhatter wrote:
Sorry Mannesty, but if you have a MF lens, the TC converter will not make it AF, no matter how hard you try. It will always stay MF as it does not have the gearing/motors etc in the lens to make it AF.
Iain (offertonhatter), my statement is correct. Technically of course, nothing can miraculously turn an MF lens into an AF one. An MF lens will always be an MF lens, whereas an AF lens can be AF or MF.

However, the combination of any MF lens + the SMCP-F 1.7x AF T/C, results in an AF combination (hence the AF in its model number). It is the T/C which performs the AF part, you just have to get somewhere close to correct focus with the MF part of the combo first.

I hope that is clear, because that is how it is.

Comment by Mannesty posted on K7 First steps... at 19/07/2010 - 14:58

Mannesty
pgweber wrote:
Would it be correct to put it this way then?

"Any Pentax fit (probably auto-focus) lenses without an aperture ring".
Umm, no, that would not be correct. The OP stated "i know nothing about sli cameras". That's a clue to me that a bit more information might be needed.

Comment by Mannesty posted on pentax mz-30 camera at 18/07/2010 - 12:25

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo