All Forum Comments
Comment by loadoftripe posted on i tried 'SPOT Metering' on my PENTAX 6x7 Mk II at 16/10/2022 - 20:07
Comment by loadoftripe posted on 14 more for the project at 15/10/2022 - 15:31
Comment by loadoftripe posted on More wet stuff!! at 15/10/2022 - 15:22
Comment by loadoftripe posted on Playing with light, darkness, patience and blending at 15/10/2022 - 15:21
Comment by loadoftripe posted on Some time in Truro, mostly Cathedral at 15/10/2022 - 15:18
K1 mkII and 28-105 dfa WR
1.

2.

3

Comment by loadoftripe posted on Sutton Harbour, Plymouth. at 15/10/2022 - 11:41
So got a few shots in of the lovely soft light, CC's welcome
1.

2.

3.

Comment by loadoftripe posted on Gutter Tor, Dartmoor. at 15/10/2022 - 11:30
Comment by loadoftripe posted on Control Room at 12/09/2022 - 12:31
Comment by loadoftripe posted on For Lovers Of Good Beer ... at 11/09/2022 - 19:28
Comment by loadoftripe posted on After Bah!!! at 11/09/2022 - 19:25


Any image which purports to be a description such as a landscape should never ever have sky replacements. I once pasted a deer into a rural scene, two images from the same location taken a while apart; it worked, no one could tell it was fake, but I binned it as I knew it was fake. Model and product shoots are another matter. As a photographer would you be truly satisfied with fakery just to win some crummy contest? In competitions that matter you would be disqualified. Anyhow with fake skies the lighting on the ground rarely matches the new sky, shadows, light direction and colour temperature are all wrong. Work with what you have, fine, but photoshop trickery is no longer photography.
I use my skill to capture 2 images maybe an hour apart or stack 20 plus images over 10 to 15 minutes. Then stack or combine them to get better light or reduced noise on high ISO... that's not fake... it just interpreting things in a modern way, just like playing in a dark room using film 25 plus years ago!
Been debated infinitum already.