All Forum Comments
Comment by Hullman posted on Pentax Wedding Photography at 09/11/2012 - 11:33
I'd be tempted to create a square crop to loose the left hand 25% of the pic to see what it looks like, you still retain the crowd, launch site and city lights but just loose the bright light which draws the eye.
Comment by Hullman posted on Fireworks at 04/11/2012 - 21:57
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/Fireworks-11.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/Fireworks-9.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/Fireworks-3.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/Fireworks-4.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by Hullman posted on More Fireworks at 04/11/2012 - 20:42
I "get" what you're saying, the k-5 is of course a much better camera under more difficult conditions and some of the shots I've had out of it at 3200 ISO and higher are amazing. I also "get" that the FA50mm will be loads better when it's wider open.
But even under controlled lighting conditions at f8 I would have expected to see the benefit of a higher resolution sensor, and significantly better glass. Its sort of like saying if you drive an BMW 1 series and BMW 7 series at 60 MPH on a smooth road the ride quality will be the same.
Just expected a bigger difference, wish I'd taken my K100Super now for a further test lol
cheers
Comment by Hullman posted on K5 vs K200D at 23/10/2012 - 15:18
I recently had an interesting weekend and had the opportunity to be part of a model shoot. In fact my girlfriend also joined me and we both had a great day. Cath is new to the Pentax world and also new to DSLR photography, she's inherited my old K200D as I've now upgraded to a K-5.
Below are a couple of sample shots we both took, pretty much one after the other. All the lighting was exactly the same, both cameras were set to the same settings (ISO 200, F8.0, 125) and we were using a radio flash trigger to fire the studio lights. Now, I was using the K-5 and the FA50 1.4mm and Cath was using the K200D with 18-55mm Kit Lens. Given that my set up is newer, more expensive, better quality with better glass I cant really see a massive difference between the quality of the two shots. To be fair, I slightly prefer the K200d !!
All the images are exported from Lightroom and the only adjustments I've made are to adjust WB to be the same and crop.
K-5, FA 50mm 1.4, Full size :
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/Camilla-1_zps8fe24549.jpg[/IMG]
K200D, DA 18-55mm, Full size :
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/Camilla-2_zpsea498a32.jpg[/IMG]
K-5, FA 50mm 1.4, Crop :
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/Camilla-Face-1_zpsdf8dcc5a.jpg[/IMG]
K200D, DA 18-55mm, Crop :
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/Camilla-Face-2_zpsc4b3b1a4.jpg[/IMG]
Am I being stupid, what am I missing ?
Yours Confused
Andy
Comment by Hullman posted on K5 vs K200D at 23/10/2012 - 14:30
They were taken at Hull Fair in East Yorkshire. It's the largest traveling fair in Europe and is firmly routed in my childhood memories, my mum and dad used to take me every year so I'm trying to do the same with my kids, despite the fact the live in St Albans lol. For those that know it, the evening was finished with a Patie n' Chips from Bob Carvers and bag of Wrights Brandy Snap.
Comments always welcome...
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/IMG_0640.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/IMG_0628.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/IMG_0632.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/IMG_0634.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/IMG_0635.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/IMG_0650.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/IMG_0649.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1269.photobucket.com/albums/jj591/akkirkby/IMG_0644.jpg[/IMG]
Andy
Comment by Hullman posted on First outing with the Sigma 10-20mm at 20/10/2012 - 13:10
Seems like a good little camera if, like you say Carl, she does't mind lack of pocket-ability.
Andy
Comment by Hullman posted on Pentax x-5 ?? at 26/09/2012 - 13:39
I was wondering about recommending the new Pentax x-5, as it seems like good value for £200 giving her a great optical zoom and decent features, she seems quite open to having a bridge camera rather than a compact type camera. IQ, is her primary motivation.
Just wondered if anyone has any other recommendations at that price point, it's not a market I know well !
many thanks
Andy
Comment by Hullman posted on Pentax x-5 ?? at 25/09/2012 - 13:48


That's really interesting thank you for sharing.
I just wondered about why you shoot on JPEG rather than RAW? Also when you're taking candid shots at the reception (first dance etc), how often do you have to revert to Flash rather than push the ISO etc?
Cheers
Andy