Frogfish

Joined: 10th September 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Frogfish
jvs wrote:
Thank you all for your comments! First, my limited experience of serious photography still makes it hard to judge sharpness at times - what looks reasonably sharp to me and my eyes sometimes needs a direct comparison with a better shot to show me what real sharpness is. While being quite pleased with this set, I can see nevertheless that they could be sharper; second, to answer the first question, all bar the bullfinch were taken resting the camera on my hand on the lip of a hide window - haven't as yet got a bean bag; the bullfinch was handheld, crouched down and very uncomfortable - didn't have my stool or tripod with me! So lucky to get anything anywhere near sharp, I suppose. Finally, I tend to go for RAW + JPEG setting at the moment, but I'm beginning to think that takes too long to write to the card, so am undecided about what to do - any advice seriously considered!
If anyone would care to look at a couple of other posts later, I'd love your views on those.
Thanks again,
Hi John ..... see my post above on my views re. RAW. Unless you are firing off series bursts then the write time is not an issue at all. In PP you can set up presets but in any case it doesn't slow down my workflow in the slightest (this may vary depending on which software you are using .. I use Aperture 3).

I would strongly advise that a) in a blind you have the camera mounted to a tripod with a good ball-head and b) that in walking/stalking you use a very good monopod, when you can plant it then it will improve the shot and even if you don't have time for that the extra weight will help steady your arm.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Finches at Fairburn at 28/02/2012 - 07:23

Frogfish
George Lazarette wrote:
[quote:3496ace15f="Frogfish"]

Hmmm. If the picture is properly exposed to start with, and no subsequent adjustment is made to exposure in the computer, then I don't think RAW is going to add any more detail.

But I concur that using RAW is good advice. When you don't get the exposure right first time, then RAW will be very helpful.

G
I have found there is a huge difference in the DR when shooting RAW over even the highest Jpg settings and this becomes critical when shooting e.g. backlit birds or those in bushes (in many cases there is often no choice as the birds won't oblige with their choice of branch !). It's often the difference between a keeper and trashing the shot. Of course I also advise using spot metering for the bird .... in which case RAW is often then critical to recover the background.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Finches at Fairburn at 28/02/2012 - 07:18

Frogfish
If it is only for macro then the 90mm gives you a little more working distance and with skittish insects every mm counts ! The Sigma 105mm may be a better consideration vs the Tamron than the 70mm.

I have the Tamron and it is a superb lens, the heavily recessed front element means you don't really need to use the hood at all (giving you a lot more working room to your subject) and the focus limiter switch is a very important feature for me. They will all make superb portrait lenses too.

Please take a look at my SmugMug portfolio for lots of macro shots - most of them taken taken with the Tamron 90 di.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Sigma 70mm or Tamron 90mm f2.8 at 28/02/2012 - 06:45

Frogfish
This is a really nice set .... and I love the bullfinch !

However if I may say, these seem a little soft for the DA*300 and K5 and that surprises me. I'd be looking for the sort of detail (and more) shown in #6 - the Greenfinch. Are you stabilising your lens on a tripod/monopod ?

BTW are you shooting in RAW ? If not then for birding you absolutely should, it would bring out so much more detail.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Finches at Fairburn at 27/02/2012 - 18:00

Frogfish
Very nice, good detail. How well does that lens work with the x1.7 ?

Comment by Frogfish posted on 50-135mm + AF1.7x TC at 27/02/2012 - 15:43

Frogfish
senn wrote:
Frogfish wrote:
Very nice set Gary ! Classic pose for #1 but I really like the Ruddy Darter too. What is the minimum focusing distance for that Sigma ?
closest focus : 400cm / 157.4 in. (source : SLR Gear)

sorry, the question wasn't directed at me ..
thanks Senn.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Dragonflies and Butterflies at 27/02/2012 - 12:29

Frogfish
Very nice set Gary ! Classic pose for #1 but I really like the Ruddy Darter too. What is the minimum focusing distance for that Sigma ?

Comment by Frogfish posted on Dragonflies and Butterflies at 26/02/2012 - 16:05

Frogfish
Still27 wrote:
Wow these shots are fantastic, I just want to get over there and try to get one shot as good as yours.
Ha ha - thank you, glad you enjoyed them !

Comment by Frogfish posted on Dragonflies of Sanya, Hainan Island, China at 26/02/2012 - 15:39

Frogfish
Your flies seem so much dirtier than our flies over here

Very nice series - I like the hovers in flight best because I know they are not at all easy and these are excellent.

Comment by Frogfish posted on macro insect shots at 25/02/2012 - 18:31

Frogfish
Easily #2. The water draining back through the pebbles and the wave action a little further out both add a lot of interest to this lovely shot.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Two different versions from Aldeburgh at 25/02/2012 - 15:35

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo