All Forum Comments
Comment by Don posted on Help please - posting images at 11/02/2006 - 21:22
I'm sure that two 500 ftz's or a 500ftz and a 300 ftz will give ttl main and fill on an istd or ds2 with that kind of set up....just curious...
Comment by Don posted on Using multiple AF400FTZ's at 10/02/2006 - 13:13
28-70 f4 with cokin filter adapter.
50mm 1.4 with cokin filter adapter.
reverse mount the 50mm to the camera mounted 28-70 with a piece of electric tape (on the filter rings not the lenses themselves.)
http://homepage.mac.com/lightexpressions/macro/macro.html
Comment by Don posted on macro lens for ist DS at 17/02/2006 - 00:32
Usually with digital you get a purple bluish cast....
I'm thinking that the lighting angle and red abberations are attribitable to late afternoon sunlight (already warm) being colored more by the reflective gold, creating a red cast to normal lens flare.
Comment by Don posted on macro lens for ist DS at 11/02/2006 - 22:18
here's an example of what you can get:
1/125s f22, af1.7 tc, ringflash, ist ds2

and the center:

Comment by Don posted on SMC 50 mm 1:1.7 at 07/07/2006 - 05:02
linear won't be compatible if you wind up slapping it on an af camera.
linear is less expensive therefore built to buget minded photogs with glass and coating quality to match the budget price.
Bear in mind that before circular became the standard, btw, and tiffin and others had some great linear poarizers out there that might be found used for a song...not bad if you only use older mf cameras or stack infront of a circular pol, to use as a vari strength neutral density filter.
Comment by Don posted on Polarizing Filter for SP1000 at 09/02/2006 - 14:16
Comment by Don posted on photoshop or elements? at 09/02/2006 - 14:00
For those that care to check it out, here's a shot I did in studio last night.
In the oft overlooked ps elements, I laid out a proof of concept for my customer..twenty minutes after the shoot.
Of course I'll re-open the file and finish it in photoshop before taking to lab for 16x20's but for many folks, I thought the proof of concept would impress with elements capabilities. Well worth the money for those that can't afford its' big brother.
http://homepage.mac.com/lightexpressions/Angel/Angel.html
Comment by Don posted on photoshop or elements? at 09/02/2006 - 00:02
Get the gimp photo editor. or use whatever you got, and while your shopping for a lens, you can try stitching together panoramas for free.
Hard to get good ultrawides cheap these days. seems digital sensors have created a demand which has created a sellers market.
Comment by Don posted on Low cost wide angle solution for ist DL at 07/02/2006 - 22:29


