All Forum Comments
Comment by chris_jl posted on K7, K10 or istD? at 14/04/2010 - 16:52
C
Comment by chris_jl posted on After more practise at 25/03/2010 - 22:22
I would say that the Sigma 10-20 and Sigma 24-70 are the two lenses I now keep in my kit no matter what. The last 2 spaces in the bag are used for whatever I need in addition.
One thing I have been playing with is an impulse buy - a Panasonic GF-1 - with the 2 kit lenses - a 14-45 & 45-200. And I swore not to buy any more. I get good landscape shots by using a 0.70x wide angle adapter and macro shots with a Raynox-250. This may be solution if you are low on cash for outlay - namely going the converter route.
Anyhow - good luck with choosing - there seem to be good options recommended in posts before mine.
C
Comment by chris_jl posted on Advice on upgrading from kit lens at 22/03/2010 - 18:41
In Spain they put them all in a wall
C
Comment by chris_jl posted on Incase anyone interested at 04/03/2010 - 11:00
hello i have been out and about today and come across this wonderful graveyard [...] its in West Brompton London just as you get off train
Looking forward to see what you've managed on your visit.
C
Comment by chris_jl posted on Incase anyone interested at 03/03/2010 - 17:56
Most firmly, I have to say, whatever lets you take and sell photos is a pro system. Nothing more, nothing less. I've recently had 40 odd photos I took in Costa Rica published by the Open University - all taken on a K100D (all of 6MP). Before that I had a Canon S2 IS - yes, a bloody point and shoot - and I sold photos from that happily. Really all people want (as far as I can tell) is an image that sells their point of view and they don't give a tinkers cuss if it was taken on a Nikon, Pentax or a Technika-almost-disposable-digital-point-and-shoot. All so long as you shoot what they want.
C
Comment by chris_jl posted on Is the Pentax a Pro System? at 01/03/2010 - 21:33
Comment by chris_jl posted on Are Pentax likely to follow suit? at 23/02/2010 - 17:49
The anti-terrorism argument is being used for everything these days. The only people winning are the government and the terrorists.
The second issue stems from our paranoid obsession (sometimes justified) with identity theft, or data privacy. The legislation is there to protect our private data from misuse, and there is nothing there about photography.
There have been a few court cases, most notably JK Rowling's 2008 case against Big Pictures Ltd, for photographing her son. Rowling argued and won a ruling that her son was entitled to privacy (under ECHR article even though he was in the street. It followed on from that, that the "personal data" illegally obtained and handled by Big Pictures also broke data protection law. Out-law has the details here.
The current ICO position, then, is an extrapolation of the above. If privacy is possible in a public place, then what comprises privacy? During the consultation, this question has been asked by an organisation that represents photographers.
According to the ICO response, which Copyright Action has seen, simply not wanting to be photographed is all it takes.
The issue is that the people who propose the laws are acting either with a knee jerk response to some Daily Mail slogan or from some vested commercial interest (and who can deny that our MPs are looking at anything other than the best interests of their pocketses?) - leading to poorly formulated law rushed through and frequently barely given a second thought beyond what is available for pudding in the canteen.
C
PS apologies for the excessive quoting - this surrounding of everything with pseudo HTML and some quoted paras don't start with a quote but end with a /quote makes untangling the chain a bit difficult.
Comment by chris_jl posted on Upcoming changes to UK Photo laws at 20/02/2010 - 11:59
Nice lines but I feel it needs a stronger sky - more solid blue to hold its own against the windows.
It's not getting to me, really it's not. I used to put up with it being rather 'flat' round here as the weather is nice, but of late it's just proven to be grey, boring, flat and wet.
I'm going to stare into a lamp for 10 mins and pretend I'm somewhere interesting. With hills.
C
Comment by chris_jl posted on Blue on blue at 19/02/2010 - 00:53

