chirpy

Joined: 8th July 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

chirpy
Quote:
Here are two simple test images
That certainly looks like quite a marked lean. Out of interest:

Did you remember to turn off SR?
Did you check the viewfinder after the picture was taken, without touching the camera, to see if it was still aligned as expected?

I was going to suggest removing (very carefully) and refitting the focusing screen incase it's not properly aligned, but you've shown lean when levelled using the bottom of the viewfinder.

Comment by chirpy posted on [poll] Did/Do you notice leaning images with your K10D? at 22/09/2007 - 23:43

chirpy
I've tested my GX10 on a tripod with a cable release and no SR matching lines with 4 lenses (one prime and 3 zooms) at ~200mm (I was actually testing the quality of the lenses) - no lean here.

If I don't use the cable release still with no SR - very slight lean on some. Conclusion for me, on my tests, pressing the shutter release makes the camera lean ever so slightly, depending on the force I apply on the shutter release.

WRT forum polls, they have no real statistical meaning with such few results. Firstly, you'd certainly need a sample in excess of 1000, then you'd need a truly random sample of pentax owners. This isn't random since people with a perceived problem are more likely to vote.

Comment by chirpy posted on [poll] Did/Do you notice leaning images with your K10D? at 22/09/2007 - 17:50

chirpy
Quote:
so ...about the original issue:apart from the over priced KatzEye, any split screen in mind?
I purchased one of these from this seller for a few quid and it worked just fine. I had some issues using it with Macro work, so haven't been using it so much of late:
http://tinyurl.com/2rqo87

Comment by chirpy posted on Focusing screens for K10D at 18/09/2007 - 22:06

chirpy
Quote:
I would like to keep v 8.10 running separately, but fear that X2 may well 'trash it' in the process ? What has been your experience with X2 thus far ?
There's little difference between X1 and X2, but you'll probably notice a raft of changes from v8. One thing some do complain about is the speed of PSP, and I must say that it is slow. That can be quite annoying when you're making small adjustments with the full screen preview.

Other than that, I find the noise reduction and intuitive (to me anyway) interface of greatest benefit to me.

IIRC, installing the latest version placed it in a version specific directory and left the older version intact, so you should still be able to switch between the two.

Quote:
As an aside, I recently downloaded the latest trial version 4.9 of BIBBLE Pro in order to have a quick 'look-see' and was totally GOBSMACKED to discover that there is NO UNDO button !....ANYWHERE !!
Indeed. I couldn't fathom that. I also missed the ability to crop to my own desired dimensions before then resizing the image. Apparently both features (undo/redo and proper cropping) are coming in v5 of Bibble.

Comment by chirpy posted on K10D RAW Support AT LAST in Corel Paint Shop ProŽ Photo X2 ! at 11/09/2007 - 21:23

chirpy
Well, I'll happily admit to using PSP (now upgraded to X2).

I've tried the others and this one fits my style of use and preferences and I'm very happy with the results I get from it.

I did play with Bibble for some time for RAW processing, but it exceeds my needs. I've also tried PS and PSE.

I can't justify the extortionate (IMHO) price of PS when I won't use 99% of its features where I can find 90%+ of the ones I need from software that costs a fraction of the price.

One thing I'd certainly say, PSP is very slow compared to, say, Bibble which is like lightening in comparison, but I'm patient enough

Comment by chirpy posted on K10D RAW Support AT LAST in Corel Paint Shop ProŽ Photo X2 ! at 10/09/2007 - 22:23

chirpy
I doubt that it would make much difference. SR is intended to compensate for small movements in hand shake and only in the vertical plane. I would imagine you'd need high shutter speeds (and therefore fast glass) and/or a stabilisation system as you mentioned.

Comment by chirpy posted on K10 shake reduction at 03/09/2007 - 10:17

chirpy
That's a nifty little site.

Comment by chirpy posted on 50-200mm Xenon at 31/08/2007 - 16:15

chirpy
Now that made me laugh

Comment by chirpy posted on Tonight's moon at 31/08/2007 - 16:17

chirpy
I'd go with 1 also - focus is that bit sharper on and around the beak.

How do you find the weight of the 135-400mm Sigma? Do you always use a tripod or also use it hand-held? I had the 170-500mm Sigma and although it was possible to use it hand-held I found it difficult to get stability at the long length (understandably).

Comment by chirpy posted on Which of these two photos do you prefer? at 27/08/2007 - 21:44

chirpy
Quote:
I found this amazing website http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/articles/fauna_macro_photography.htm

He tends to use TC's and a 180mm macro lens.
It was that guys site (plus a few others) that made me splash out on the 180mm macro.

I love my 50mm lens, but the longer lens does help get a lot of shots I wouldn't be able to get as close to with the light needed, in particular very small insects:

Comment Image

Comment by chirpy posted on Macro photography setups at 04/09/2007 - 22:17

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo