wadna

Joined: 19th July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

wadna
Jimbro66 wrote:
wadna wrote:
"An 18-70WR is also a welcome addition. Hopefully it might be better built than the current 17-70"

What's wrong with the build quality of the 17-70? I've only had one a relatively short time (replacing a Sigma 17-70) & so far I have no problems with it's build quality. Certainly it's in a different league to the Sigma.
The answer is that build quality is variable. I have rejected three examples that had unacceptably wobbly barrels and sloppy focus rings (and plenty more examples of this have been reported elsewhere and even demonstrated online) but no doubt others will report that their 17-70s have tight barrels and perfectly damped rings. IMHO Pentax lens QC still has room for improvement - but that's a different thread.

Best regards

Jim
Thanks Jim. I confess my 17-70 zoom creeps as I carry it which is a source of annoyance.
Regards,
Ian.

Comment by wadna posted on Two more front ends at 25/02/2014 - 21:40

wadna
"An 18-70WR is also a welcome addition. Hopefully it might be better built than the current 17-70"

What's wrong with the build quality of the 17-70? I've only had one a relatively short time (replacing a Sigma 17-70) & so far I have no problems with it's build quality. Certainly it's in a different league to the Sigma.

Comment by wadna posted on Two more front ends at 24/02/2014 - 06:36

wadna
DA21. It suits my style & I can shoot from the hip. The lens is also unobtrusive which is a big plus. 21 is a very versatile FL, so much so I will go out with only that lens.

I've spoilt myself with a DA15 recently & it's useful at closer quarters than is suitable for the 21 but I'm just getting to know & like this lens.

Comment by wadna posted on your favourite k-mount street lens is? ... at 08/02/2014 - 00:03

wadna
I haven't read all the thread but for me, besides the obvious ones I've seen mentioned, is the better continuous shooting mode options of 3fps, 4.5fps & 8.3fps. They are really useful speeds unlike my K-5 which only has 1.6fps (too slow to be useful) & 7fps.
This, along with the better exposure & WB makes the K-3 a must buy unit as far as I'm concerned as they are major improvements. Now all I have to do is persuade my wife.............

Comment by wadna posted on [Considering upgrade] Where else is K-3 strategically better than K-5IIs? at 25/01/2014 - 00:33

wadna
Brand loyalty & I like to stick up for the underdog. I started with a Spotmatic then added an SP1000 - those were the days you needed a couple of bodies, one for colour & another for B&W.
Moved to digital when the *istD was introduced followed by a K-7 & now a K-5.
Now I have several lenses, well probably a box full really. & I would hate to have to acquire all those lenses for another mount. Speaking of which, it concerns me that the K mount will probably die before I die.

Comment by wadna posted on What Reason Makes U insist on Pentax's Camera at 25/01/2014 - 00:19

wadna
My K-5 has locked up twice. Turned it off (which made no difference) took the battery out, reinstalled the battery & all OK.

Comment by wadna posted on K3 locked up at 12/01/2014 - 09:28

wadna
johnriley wrote:
There's more to lenses though than resolution tests. of the three Limited lenses I had, I eventually kept the worst performer of the three, the 43mm f/1.9, because I liked its overall rendering best.

Why didn't I keep the 31mm and 77mm? Limited funds at that time is the simple answer and although I'd bought a number of lenses as a bulk buy the others had to be moved on. Reality of the moment.
Which is why they are designated Limited John.

Comment by wadna posted on Consolidating my lens collection . Good Idea? at 09/01/2014 - 21:54

wadna
Conqueror wrote:
The sigma is massively bigger than the FA 31mm I thought? and weighs more.

Not sure it has the same quality metal construction as well?
Now that's really saying something as the FA31 is HEAVY for what is is i.e. a standard FL prime.

Comment by wadna posted on Consolidating my lens collection . Good Idea? at 08/01/2014 - 21:22

wadna
"I also wouldn't mix in that Sigma lens, there are better options in the Pentax range, not least the 31mm Limited."

At a price John, at a price. The FA31 is expensive but I love mine.


" I had FA31 before, nice lens, but maybe better on film than on digital"

Now I can't think why that would be so. Mine performs well on my K-5.

Comment by wadna posted on Consolidating my lens collection . Good Idea? at 06/01/2014 - 10:48

wadna
Algernon wrote:
I can't think of any downsides as long as the exposure is
correct. You would of course need good light and it would
work well with flash.

It does effect the highlight/shadow protection, but I think
you are restricted to ISO 200 with that anyway.

-
ISO 160 not 200 but that is splitting hairs at 1/3 stop.

Comment by wadna posted on Low ISO at 22/03/2013 - 04:37

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo