All Forum Comments
Comment by wadna posted on Sigma 70-300 not working at 26/06/2014 - 23:25
I wish my images were good enough for anyone to want to steal them!
Comment by wadna posted on Copyright infringement at 19/06/2014 - 10:49
My input would be to think more about other features of the K3 than just image quality and here are some of the points to consider:
27 focus points, 3 of them flux array 2.8. Better control of focus and more accurate. The tracking is also far better on the K3 compared to the K5ll/s.
Three levels of AA filter which can also be bracketed too.
Duel SD card slots, really useful if you need to back up or shoot in RAW & JPEG at the same time, or assign video to one card, still images to another.
Wi FI tethered device shooting (could be very useful for wildlife?)
24 mega pixels will give you more ability to crop images without losing detail.
I have owned every Pentax camera since the K10, and the K3 is the best camera Pentax have ever made in my opinion and as a photographic tool, its a great camera that can be used for virtually anything with the right glass.
Comment by wadna posted on Which new body? at 17/04/2014 - 08:04
There are 2 other Pentax users in my camera club (which only has about 30 members).
Comment by wadna posted on Finding other PENTAX users Out & About at 13/04/2014 - 09:04
I've started thinking about it to replace my Sigma 70-300 which is disappointing. It's slow to focus & IQ, particularly at the long end, pretty ordinary. The downside to the 60-250 is the weight & the price......
Comment by wadna posted on Da* lenses at 29/03/2014 - 23:41
Comment by wadna posted on Limited Edition 645D at 27/03/2014 - 18:56
What's wrong with 2011 wadna?
Comment by wadna posted on Limited Edition 645D at 27/03/2014 - 09:02
More mouth-watering details from EPZ:
http://www.ephotozine.com/article/pentax-645d-japan-special-edition-16951
Comment by wadna posted on Limited Edition 645D at 27/03/2014 - 06:26
It doesn't matter how sharp the original file is resizing softens it so a little sharpening is required.
Interestingly I've found my K-5 files can take more sharpening than the K-7 files. Don't know why this should be.
Comment by wadna posted on K3 & F*250-600mm, first test inc. RAW file! at 26/03/2014 - 10:07


People talk fondly of the quality of K10D images & CCD v CMOS sensors. I can't comment except to say that I found the K-7 sensor disappointingly noisy & felt the K-7 images needed more sharpening than the *istD.
If I were in the upgrade market I would consider a K-5 for it's excellent sensor.