RR

Joined: 3rd December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

RR
No Photos !

Comment Image



Not posed or taken especially for the competition, but the opportunity presented itself so I thought I'd enter.

Camera Make: PENTAX
Camera Model: PENTAX K20D
Image Date: 2009:06:02 16:12:08
Flash Used: No
Focal Length: 70.0mm (35mm equivalent: 105mm)
Exposure Time: 0.0025 s (1/400)
Aperture: f/8.0
ISO equiv: 100

Comment by RR posted on Fortnightly Competition # 17 "Hands" at 06/06/2009 - 20:17

RR
I came home today happy that I had finally managed to take a shot of someone at work. I processed my image, went to the competition only to find it closed ! Doesn't time fly when the weather's good

Oh well, next time perhaps.

Comment by RR posted on Weekly Competition #99 - People at work at 02/06/2009 - 22:23

RR
Very nice Gwyn, you've donw well to make a great exposure in what seem like difficult conditions.

#2 for me, although the foreground is a little dark I love the sense of scale that the wonderful sky brings to the shot.

Comment by RR posted on Mount St Helens at 02/06/2009 - 22:04

RR
Quote:
All electrical circuits generate random electrical impulses as well as the signal proper. You can hear it from a loudspeaker as hiss. You see it in an image as noise.
I'm waiting for Pentax to do a deal with Dolby to create a noise reduction system

Comment by RR posted on Digital Camera Noise at 02/06/2009 - 11:40

RR
Thanks for the challenge & the judging Pete. I'm not going to set the next challenge as the participation is somewhat lacking. Apologies to those who have enjoyed it, I wonder if Brian (isdky) wants to continue it by setting the next challenge.
This may be more a challenge for the drab winter months when people are sat at their computer with some time on their hands perhaps.

Comment by RR posted on RAW Challenge #4 at 02/06/2009 - 11:12

RR
The camera never lies...

A flood at Battersea.

Comment Image

Comment by RR posted on RAW Challenge #4 at 25/05/2009 - 18:23

RR
isdky, sorry. Competition was posted as closing at midday. I didn't judge until past 16:00 so there was a window for latecomers.

Thanks for offering to host the RAWs for this comp.


I hope I didn't do too bad a job of commenting & I look forward to playing with iceblinkers RAW on the next rainy day

Comment by RR posted on RAW challenge #3 at 24/05/2009 - 20:08

RR
Ok, a dissappointing number of entries after the last comp produced so many.
I hope I haven't managed to single-handedly kill off this fledgling competition

Just a quick comment on each from me.

Anvh: I'm guessing you tonemapped this one as you've produced alot of detail in the shadow areas. Unfortunately the blues seem a little posterized & the telltale halo around the tower is evident. Nice vibrant image though.

jackitec: I like the straight sides to the tower in your version, the correction of the barrel distortion has led to an increase in perspective distortion though, which I find less pleasing. But on the plus side it does make me look thinner !! A good side-effect of the corrected distortion is that you've cropped off the blown highlights to the left.

iceblinker: You've one a very nice job on the Raw conversion, nice tones & plenty of detail brought out in the shallower shadow areas. A small crop has got rid of some of the blown highlights, but those that remain still draw the eye. I'd have liked to have seen a little more saturation but overall a good job.

piotro: You've gone for a tight crop here which doesn't work for me, the edges of the tower are just out of frame & my eye follows the line down & out of frame which doesn't hold the attention long enough. Tones are rich but the image seems a little flat & doesn't pop at all.

MGraley: A very original take on the image. The Blur vignette has isolated the subject well & brought it out from the background, unfortunately as it has blurred the edged of the tower also it does look unnatural. If you had managed to blur the foreground & background but keep the tower sharp (to appear as tight DOF) this would have been a great image.. The image isn't straight either, ok there aren't any straigh lines to go off but it seems to have a slight tilt to it. Great idea, had it been a little more polished, it would have been unbeatable.

kemp: An even closer crop, very creative as it highlights the great architecture, reflected & distorted by the mirrored tower. The processing which has led to different tones of blue in the tower & background is great, but it has led to a blown area of cloud which is just too off-putting for me.

Winner: iceblinker, I would have liked to have seen a slightly more imaginative crop, but as an exercise in getting the best detail from a RAW file, iceblinker has shown us the way. A well deserved win & over to you iceblinker to provide the next RAW for us to play with. I also hope the participation will increase once more in the next RAW challenge. Thanks to all who entered.

Bob

Comment by RR posted on RAW challenge #3 at 24/05/2009 - 16:21

RR
Makes a world of difference I think.

Comment by RR posted on Lil' Dude at 21/05/2009 - 21:02

RR
Quote:
Chocolate powder on the froth
Lots of choco I'd say. Plenty of lavazza though.

You can't beat a fresh coffee, I've an automatic bean to coffee machine at home & although it's not as good a manually made espresso it's darn close when you get the grind size right. Almost zero mess too !

Quote:
Freshly made and not instant, starbucks etc.

Bring it on!
I've had some pleasant coffees from Starbucks on occassion, it totally depends on the Barista you get really.

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Coffee !!

Comment by RR posted on Join me in a coffee ? at 21/05/2009 - 20:55

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo