All Forum Comments
Comment by Pwynnej posted on K10D in the UK at 28/09/2006 - 22:12
I bought one in the Sales for 500 pounds in Jacobs, their last one, discounted as it was non-DG.
Absolutely beauty!
Comment by Pwynnej posted on Sigma 100-300 mm f4 EX at 02/01/2007 - 10:12
I do have the 70-200 f2.8 EX at home which is lovely.
I am slightly irritated about the f5.6 maximum aperture at 300 mm with my current 70-300 lens. As I still use 100 speed film..
Does anyone have experience of this 100-300 lens??
Comment by Pwynnej posted on Sigma 100-300 mm f4 EX at 28/09/2006 - 15:40
Funny how things come around...
http://pdatpo.blog45.fc2.com/blog-entry-3805.html
http://www.estiasis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=630
The K1D was the full frame that never saw the light of production-day.
The recent article I saw only suggested that there would be others... when and what they would be was not discussed.
Matt
I think the name MZ-D was mentioned
Comment by Pwynnej posted on Future Pentax cameras at 28/09/2006 - 15:49
Then I was offered a Z-10, although basic, absolutely faultless, sold to finance Z-1p purchase
then a Z-20 which I sold 3 years ago to buy the MZ-S
in the meantime obtained Mamiya 645, a Z-1 which I keep...
Simplicity is the beauty to the Pentax system- so intuitive that the instruction manuals can be sold as in mint condition....
Waited for the *ist D, then for the price to drop, bought it and promptly dropped it
while it was being repaired now have the DL too.....
my GF is trying to get me to change over to Canon, she has a 300D with a L-series lenses, lenses good, camera body horrid..
I think that most will agree that Pentax are more consistent, you can buy good or very good lenses, with Nikon and Canon, you might get very good but they do some dreadful lenses too
I am waiting for news on the mythical K1D (why do a 100 and 10 if you don't make a 1??) before flexing my credit card. There's no rush as I have plenty of choice at home
Comment by Pwynnej posted on Why did you buy a Pantax? at 25/09/2006 - 19:00
A well known Belgian beer is advertised as being "refreshingly expensive". I think these lenses will be "unaffordably expensive" for most of us here but I can't see Georges 'lens diet' lasting much longer than March 2007
I have no doubt that they will be "Stella(r)" performers.
My nutritional needs are supported by belgian beer, and there are MANY, MANY better belgian beers than Stella Artois....
Stella price yes, Stella quality NO!, Leffe/Corsendonk/Chimay/Duvel quality - Mastercard sir, that will do nicely
Comment by Pwynnej posted on New Pentax Lenses announced today 21 Sept 06 at 21/09/2006 - 16:03
I'll hold off the 16-45 and see what the 16-50 is like.
Only disappointment is that they are DA and not D-FA... does that mean Pentax will definitely stay with the small sensor???
Comment by Pwynnej posted on New Pentax Lenses announced today 21 Sept 06 at 21/09/2006 - 10:27
I still remember the day I bought the Z-1p 11 years ago.......
Comment by Pwynnej posted on Which older Pentax film camera? at 22/09/2006 - 00:05
If you use a film a week, you will pay for a basic Pentax DSLR within a year or so. Cost-wise, digital wins hands down.
So, you CAN afford a DSLR if you take pictures regularly. However, if you buy two films a year for holidays, and have no plans to change, then stick with film.
As for which film body, I echo JR's thoughts concerning MF bodies (although I would add the Super A), but almost all the AF bodies are now affordable; the only exceptions being the Z1-P and the MZ-S. Have a look here:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/
George
Comment by Pwynnej posted on Which older Pentax film camera? at 20/09/2006 - 23:22
I don't know the name but there are some spectacular falls at the top of Wensleydale, I don't mean like Hardraw Force, but nice ones like Aysgarth but easier to photograph...
Comment by Pwynnej posted on A picture.. at 19/09/2006 - 12:31


Or should I wait for the DA* lenses?
The mythical K1-D
Or stick with the Z-1, Z-1p, MZ-S, *ist D and DL...
Yum Yum