All Forum Comments
Comment by pgweber posted on RAW processing at 30/11/2012 - 17:39
You don't always agree with "why balk" questioners, do you Smeggy?
Comment by pgweber posted on RAW processing at 29/11/2012 - 22:13
It would speed the repairs compared with sending off Recorded Delivery and then estimate and acceptance by postal correspondence.
It may or may not be worthwhile (or necessary) for any work on my K10D as it still functions fine, although I think there is a small piece of plastic rattling around in the battery compartment. If that could be decided on site that would save on postage.
Besides I have never had a walk round Stoke!
Comment by pgweber posted on Johnsons Photopia Ltd at 25/11/2012 - 13:01
Has anyone had anything repaired while they waited?
My 16-45 is in need of repair as a bump on the front of the lens has caused the focus & zoom mechanisms to jam.
I would also quite like them to take a look at my K10D following the drop 18 months ago that snapped my 55-300 plus existing "slanty" viewfinder issues and also to check the focussing action on repaired 55-300.
With that little lot, a day return on the train compares favourably with postage charges.
Comment by pgweber posted on Johnsons Photopia Ltd at 25/11/2012 - 11:52
The solution I used was to download Adobe DNG converter (v6.3.0.79 running currently) and by "converting" the original *.DNG to *.DNG, it makes the images viewable/editable.
See the Adobe website at:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=106&platform=Windows
Other forum users in the past have noted that a useful by-product of this "conversion" process is to reduce the file-size of the reulting *.dng file.
I have used the DNG converter to convert K10 PEFs to DNG as well.
Comment by pgweber posted on Silkypix problem at 24/11/2012 - 13:27
Best wishes
Comment by pgweber posted on Joint effort at 19/11/2012 - 14:09
edit: Just noticed the although the ruler is perfectly in focus at the 75 mark with what appears to be perfect fade into OOF either side, the carpet is sharply in focus for the 2cm or so in front of the 75. Is that right - sort of thought it would be the 1cm either side of the 75 that would be in focus?
The height of the ruler above the carpet is relevant too as noted by another poster.
And no, I have not checked any of my lenses but feel that I ought to sometime (responded to poll).
Is it that the debug/menu adjustments have the same effect as positioning a shim between camera mount and lens to compensate for manufacturing tolerances?
Comment by pgweber posted on Poll: AF Accuracy Adjustments at 01/11/2012 - 09:48
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/37224059
Content for now with Pentax & Energiser versions (though my K10 Hahnel spare had a cover).
Comment by pgweber posted on 3rd party battery - K5 at 18/10/2012 - 00:21
My gripe against Energiser is that they don't supply one with the battery!
Comment by pgweber posted on 3rd party battery - K5 at 17/10/2012 - 13:49
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a304/uzielgal/Batterycapacity2.jpg
Comment by pgweber posted on 3rd party battery - K5 at 17/10/2012 - 13:21


Sorry don't understand that at all.
I was making a bit of mischief, because when a well known moderator put a question (that I paraphrased above) about batteries (oh God, no, not again), I thought that you rejected his argument.
Mannesty's recent question about software seemed to be phrased in a very similar way to the "battery" question, even spelling balk the same way (isn't it baulk?).
Regarding RAW conversion, I am using PSE-10 and only now a year on getting to grips with some of what it can do. I have no great desire to sit for ages at a computer to manipulate what I have shot, nor do I know what processing I should be applying (other than to recover the results of poor technique). I have used "Enhance lighting" to lighten shadows and darken highlights (which sometimes gives artificial looking results), but what else?