Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
I'm not sure why bother sweating whether something's 'Art' or not. Is it interesting, is perhaps more to the point.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on "Is Photography Art?" at 10/11/2010 - 17:30

Pentaxophile
You're being too modest Doug, even on that image board I can see certain pre-occupations emerging, and a penchant for strong colour! Being a visual magpie is a style in itself

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Do you have a style? at 10/11/2010 - 17:05

Pentaxophile
Hoisted by my own petard!

But they do go on to call it
Quote:
...the smc PENTAX DA 35mm F2.4 AL
and it doesn't say DA-L on the lens barrel.

But come on, typically confusing Pentax nomenclature aside, you knew which lens was being discussed!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on DA 35mm at 10/11/2010 - 16:57

Pentaxophile
I agree re Camus and Lilly. And I also nominate Jaromir: https://www.pentaxuser.com/user/jaromir-6721/gallery

I can think of several others too, but I'll keep it at that for now.

No-one want to blow their own trumpet? It doesn't have to mean that you are terribly self satisfied about having your own style, perhaps just a particular type of picture you take from time to time which you would like to focus more on?

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Do you have a style? at 10/11/2010 - 16:43

Pentaxophile
I think Doug's right. It may not be to do with making images that self consciously go after a consistent visual style, but the idea is that an 'Artist' is trying to do something more interesting than just 'reproducing a scene' - there would be an expression of ideas or a certain way of viewing things in there. That would indeed create a sort of linking thread between the images. And there is no particular link, in my view, between how technically good the photograph is and whether it is art - some pretty ropey photographs may be very good 'art' whereas some excellent photos may not be art at all. We have to defer to the current understanding of what art is, in our culture.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on "Is Photography Art?" at 10/11/2010 - 16:28

Pentaxophile
Anvh wrote:
Not a test yet???
the DA 35 photozone.de

the DA-L 35 is another story though but some have posted some photos taken with that lens on the USA forum.
There is a link to that on this forum somewhere.

Here it is http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/118765-da-35mm-2-4...
Clever clogs, Stefan. (Clogs... how apt :wink

But aside from being pedantic, you're mistaken. There is actually no such thing as a DA-L 35mm, it's just what people have taken to calling the new DA 35mm f2.4, since it has a plastic mount.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on DA 35mm at 10/11/2010 - 16:03

Pentaxophile
The robin does look very soft, I was assuming it was a 100% crop. Bit too strong with the Neat Image?

The Chaffinch is better, though!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on First Efforts with K5 at 10/11/2010 - 15:49

Pentaxophile
On a recent thread someone has said:
Quote:
Your pictures are probably snaps unless you have developed a unique distinctive style. Have a look through the people on here and see if you can spot their images without looking at the names? Not that many are distinctive or unique. (I don't mean the subject matter either as that's often a dead giveaway).
Do you have a style?

Post a series of about 3-5 pictures which you feel demonstrate your style.... or the style you aspire to

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Do you have a style? at 10/11/2010 - 14:55

Pentaxophile
It's not asking much to progress towards a distinctive style, is it?

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on "Is Photography Art?" at 10/11/2010 - 14:53

Pentaxophile
What's wrong with it then? I quite like it!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on "Is Photography Art?" at 10/11/2010 - 14:39

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo