Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
Very ambitious idea. When you scroll down and compare the shot to the one with just streetlights you get the full picture of what they achieved.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Light painting an entire city at 11/11/2010 - 18:48

Pentaxophile
petrochemist wrote:
B******s!
This criteria rules out many of the greatest artists of all time.

Picasso, Da Vinci etc did not stick to a single style (Picasso's early work is VERY different from his later stuff). Indeed to work in diverse media/subject matter it would be impossible to.
B*****s!

Are you saying that it is impossible to distinguish a Picasso from his contemporaries? Even though he went through distinct 'phases' it's not as if he did a little bit of this, a little bit of that - "ooh today I'll do a nice Fauvist crucifixion scene, and tomorrow I'll have a crack at painting sunflowers... just as soon as I've finished writing 'this is not a pipe' under this, er, pipe"

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on "Is Photography Art?" at 11/11/2010 - 13:38

Pentaxophile
This is the kind of side by side test people have been waiting to see. Confirms the K-5 sensor is 'superior', but that the K-7 isn't quite ready for the bin yet!

The softness on the K-5 samples may be a stronger AA filter at work. BUT I am sure the softness would not really translate into prints that have been post processed. Just like the noise on the K-7 would not, up to ISO800 if not beyond in some cases.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K5 ISO worth the upgrade form K7? Compare and decide. at 11/11/2010 - 12:59

Pentaxophile
We have all learnt something today!

But I'm sure Stefan's not one to gloat, or insist that rashly offered wagers are honoured ;P

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on DA 35mm at 11/11/2010 - 09:47

Pentaxophile
beginner wrote:
When you look at this thread,the image quality and the ability to cope with noise, this is the camera which should have followed on from the K20!.....must leave the people who bought the K7 pretty deflated!

And aren't you just loving it.

How short memories are. When the k-7 came out people were spunking up all over the spec sheet. It was a resounding upgrade from the slow and rather outdated k20d, and most people thought the fact that it shared the same high resolution sensor was a good thing. The improved sensor in the K-5 was not available then.

You could say the K-7 is the camera the K20 should have been

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 11/11/2010 - 08:58

Pentaxophile
Surely you can improvise some sort of reflectors (if you want to use them)? Tinfoil on card, white sheets hung up to reflect back window light etc?

Don't understand what you say about your instructor's comments re stabilisation. You mean image stabilisation? Your instructor is there to teach photography, not provide a substitute for reading your camera manual

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Tonight's class - the penultimate one at 10/11/2010 - 22:19

Pentaxophile
Yeah, like this hooligan link

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Another pointless thread at 10/11/2010 - 19:00

Pentaxophile
Stefan you are absolutely right, only Donovan really knows so hopefully he'll confirm that later.

Meanwhile, I'll bet you £50 it was the f2.4!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on DA 35mm at 10/11/2010 - 18:53

Pentaxophile
Definitely sell it through the forum then. It's worth more than that!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K10D trade in value at 10/11/2010 - 18:29

Pentaxophile
Mike-P wrote:
DA* 55mm f1.4.

ISO 2000 @ f1.4

Comment Image

Finlay by Mike.Pursey, on Flickr
Adorable shot!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 10/11/2010 - 17:33

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo