Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
I wish you luck David. If you are not seeing a big improvement over your fuji, you must have a problem somewhere.

Fuji s9600 at ISO 800: link

The K-7 should be capable of nice detailed images up to ISO 1250 with a fine-grained noise but none of the destructive smearing and over-processing you can see on the Fuji. If you are shooting jpegs the 'low' NR settings remove the colour noise but leave behind a fine grain on higher ISO images which is film-like and not too unpleasant. Shoot RAW and use Lightroom for even better results and full control.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K7 poor image quality at 21/11/2010 - 11:23

Pentaxophile
Yes even at 100% I don't think the difference between the K-5 and d7000 is that significant (and as Mhuni says it seems to vary depending on which bit of the image you zoom in on) and as soon as you've pp'ed and printed, i'm sure it'd be impossible to tell. I don't think anyone buying the d7000 or k-5 will be kicking themselves for not getting the other camera based on iso performance alone.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 13/11/2010 - 06:40

Pentaxophile
A few more high ISO K-7 shots, although increasingly these ISOs aren't thought of as 'high' any more
ISO 1250
Comment Image

ISO 1000
Comment Image

ISO 640
Comment Image


To be honest I haven't really needed to go to much higher ISOs than these.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on high ISO with K7 at 12/11/2010 - 17:45

Pentaxophile
Have you thought about compiling 'slideshow' reports for Youtube?

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Expanding web presence for documentary photography with flickr? at 12/11/2010 - 13:49

Pentaxophile
My plan is to concentrate on street/urban photography a bit more. I keep wasting my time going after landscapes when that's never been particularly rewarding or successful for me.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Photographic ambitions for next 6 months... at 12/11/2010 - 13:03

Pentaxophile
It's seriously splitting hairs to judge a winner (IMO).

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 12/11/2010 - 12:49

Pentaxophile
Definitely on my list for Santa! You're just confirming what everyone else who's tried this lens has been saying.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on SMC Pentax-DA 1:2.4 35mm AL at 12/11/2010 - 12:36

Pentaxophile
Don't think so Stefan. As I understand it, that would just pick up normal camera shake. The issue is the sensor moving relative to the camera body and lens, rather than the whole camera moving. Go back to Falk Lumo's 'white paper' and check what he says. He has provisionally confirmed that the K-5 doesn't seem to be noticeably affected, based on some of his friend's hands-on testing, btw.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K5 ISO worth the upgrade form K7? Compare and decide. at 12/11/2010 - 00:39

Pentaxophile
Anvh wrote:
Thank you Amoringello , it looks very good.
I've an little request, if you don't mind.
Could you compare shots with shutter speeds around 1/125?
The K7 had quite some shutter blur there so hopefully they have put a new shutter in it so it doesn't do that anymore.
He will have to take it off tripod for that, & use a wide angle lens.

But you've already gone above and beyond, thank you amoringello!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K5 ISO worth the upgrade form K7? Compare and decide. at 11/11/2010 - 22:19

Pentaxophile
thoughton wrote:
Me too , it doesn't work very well. Too sticky.
Plus don't forget to let it cool sufficiently

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Sex in Fashion at 11/11/2010 - 21:39

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo