All Forum Comments
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K7 poor image quality at 21/11/2010 - 11:23
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 13/11/2010 - 06:40
ISO 1250

ISO 1000

ISO 640

To be honest I haven't really needed to go to much higher ISOs than these.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on high ISO with K7 at 12/11/2010 - 17:45
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Expanding web presence for documentary photography with flickr? at 12/11/2010 - 13:49
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Photographic ambitions for next 6 months... at 12/11/2010 - 13:03
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 12/11/2010 - 12:49
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on SMC Pentax-DA 1:2.4 35mm AL at 12/11/2010 - 12:36
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K5 ISO worth the upgrade form K7? Compare and decide. at 12/11/2010 - 00:39
Thank you Amoringello , it looks very good.
I've an little request, if you don't mind.
Could you compare shots with shutter speeds around 1/125?
The K7 had quite some shutter blur there so hopefully they have put a new shutter in it so it doesn't do that anymore.
But you've already gone above and beyond, thank you amoringello!
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K5 ISO worth the upgrade form K7? Compare and decide. at 11/11/2010 - 22:19
Me too , it doesn't work very well. Too sticky.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Sex in Fashion at 11/11/2010 - 21:39


Fuji s9600 at ISO 800: link
The K-7 should be capable of nice detailed images up to ISO 1250 with a fine-grained noise but none of the destructive smearing and over-processing you can see on the Fuji. If you are shooting jpegs the 'low' NR settings remove the colour noise but leave behind a fine grain on higher ISO images which is film-like and not too unpleasant. Shoot RAW and use Lightroom for even better results and full control.