DA 35mm

08tiger
Posted 10/11/2010 - 05:50 Link
any thoughts, comments on this lens?Cons and pros
C&C welcome.
Don.
K10D
Posted 10/11/2010 - 06:18 Link
I've not seen a test yet but, I can't imagine that it's going to be a dud. Probably the opposite.

For the price, it won’t break the bank. It should make an ideal “std” lens for walk about.

Are you considering?

Best regards
Too far from a shore.
gartmore
Posted 10/11/2010 - 11:58 Link
Mine arrived yesterday, its incredibly light - I thought for a moment SRS had sent me an empty box. Focuses quickly and an initial dozen shots show beautiful colour rendition, no signs of chromatic abberation and I was pushing it hard.

Possibly softer at f2.4 than stopped down but it is too early to tell. I'll put it through its paces today and report back.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Anvh
Posted 10/11/2010 - 15:45 Link
K10D wrote:
I've not seen a test yet but, I can't imagine that it's going to be a dud. Probably the opposite.
Not a test yet???
the DA 35 photozone.de

the DA-L 35 is another story though but some have posted some photos taken with that lens on the USA forum.
There is a link to that on this forum somewhere.

Here it is http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/118765-da-35mm-2-4...
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Edited by Anvh: 10/11/2010 - 15:50
thoughton
Posted 10/11/2010 - 15:59 Link
Anvh wrote:
K10D wrote:
I've not seen a test yet but, I can't imagine that it's going to be a dud. Probably the opposite.
Not a test yet???
the DA 35 photozone.de
Are you being deliberately obtuse?
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 10/11/2010 - 15:59
Pentaxophile
Posted 10/11/2010 - 16:03 Link
Anvh wrote:
Not a test yet???
the DA 35 photozone.de

the DA-L 35 is another story though but some have posted some photos taken with that lens on the USA forum.
There is a link to that on this forum somewhere.

Here it is http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/118765-da-35mm-2-4...
Clever clogs, Stefan. (Clogs... how apt :wink

But aside from being pedantic, you're mistaken. There is actually no such thing as a DA-L 35mm, it's just what people have taken to calling the new DA 35mm f2.4, since it has a plastic mount.
Edited by Pentaxophile: 10/11/2010 - 16:06
Anvh
Posted 10/11/2010 - 16:52 Link
Pentaxophile wrote:
But aside from being pedantic, you're mistaken. There is actually no such thing as a DA-L 35mm, it's just what people have taken to calling the new DA 35mm f2.4, since it has a plastic mount.
Pentax does call it a DA-L though.
http://www.pentaximaging.com/camera-lenses/smc_PENTAX_DA_L_35mm_F2.4_AL/

thoughton wrote:
Are you being deliberately obtuse?
To opposite actually.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Pentaxophile
Posted 10/11/2010 - 16:57 Link
Hoisted by my own petard!

But they do go on to call it
Quote:
...the smc PENTAX DA 35mm F2.4 AL
and it doesn't say DA-L on the lens barrel.

But come on, typically confusing Pentax nomenclature aside, you knew which lens was being discussed!
Anvh
Posted 10/11/2010 - 17:00 Link
Will if you look at other Pentax sites it's called DA and not DA-l, they don't know it either how to call it I think

I had an idea what lens but I wasn't sure and I'm still not to be honest.
Most are assuming it's about the DA 35 f/2.4 but it can just as easily be about the DA 35 limited.
He hasn't said "new" lens or something like that so what are the indication it's about the DA35 f/2.4?
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Edited by Anvh: 10/11/2010 - 17:06
Algernon
Posted 10/11/2010 - 17:43 Link
It's not very good, Pentax not having clear names for their 35mm's
although that has always been the case with all manufactures regarding
long lenses the aperture has to be quoted along with the focal length
i.e. 300mm f/2.8 and 300mm f/4.0 So it seems to be the fault of the
posters for not quoting apertures
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
Edited by Algernon: 10/11/2010 - 17:43
johnriley
Posted 10/11/2010 - 18:14 Link
The lens in question was clearly defined by the first three posts. Ken even mentions quite clearly f2.4
Best regards, John
gartmore
Posted 10/11/2010 - 18:23 Link
Nowhere on the lens, the box or accompanying paperwork is the lens referred to as 'DA L' although given its features perhaps it should have been.

Stefan's link to the Pentax USA page clearly contains a typo in the headline because there is no 'L' in the body text.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Anvh
Posted 10/11/2010 - 18:32 Link
johnriley wrote:
The lens in question was clearly defined by the first three posts. Ken even mentions quite clearly f2.4
That Gary and Ken assume Donovan is asking about the f/2.4 is something very differnt.

The only indication that Donovan gave about the lens is DA35 so only Donovan can know for sure if he's talking about the DA35 f/2.4 or the DA35 macro limited.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Edited by Anvh: 10/11/2010 - 18:41
Mike-P
Posted 10/11/2010 - 18:47 Link
Here we go again ..
Pentaxophile
Posted 10/11/2010 - 18:53 Link
Stefan you are absolutely right, only Donovan really knows so hopefully he'll confirm that later.

Meanwhile, I'll bet you £50 it was the f2.4!

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo