paulgee20

Joined: 7th December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

paulgee20
If thats work then when do I start? Nice ones......5 and 11

Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on Acadia at 25/07/2012 - 07:03

paulgee20
Would agree with Mike P, £320 - £360, Second hand, VGC.

Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on how much for a k7 at 24/07/2012 - 15:31

paulgee20
No argument for me, rear button and AFC every time

Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on Which AF method? Rear or shutter button? at 24/07/2012 - 15:29

paulgee20
Beautiful shots, 'nowt else to be said'

Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on More Juvenile Kingfishers at 24/07/2012 - 15:26

paulgee20
Hi Ada

Welcome to the Forum, enjoy the experience

Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on Just Joined Pentax! at 23/07/2012 - 11:31

paulgee20
There was IMHO no winding up by answering him absolutely correctly. If he had said could you please tell me what your doing? Then I would have answered him immediately by saying 'taking photos@

To not 'see' the camera was to say the least not a consideration considering that they are trained in observation. And in a Lay Bye hardly an act of Terrorism. Personally I think he had got out the wrong side of the Bed, but certainly needed some Customer Care training.

Comment by paulgee20 posted on photography is not a crime at 22/07/2012 - 10:31

paulgee20
I was approached one day whilst sat in the car, (two summer ago), with my Camera rested on the door, I had the Siggy 150-500mm on and was sat taking photo's of Rooks on some grass about 10 yards away. The copper was in an un-marked car without standard uniform on, (unmarked motorway patrol). He pulled up alongside and asked me if I minded telling him what I was doing. I answered quite correctly and said 'No i dont mind you asking'

At this stage he got really stroppy and started to threaten me with the Terrorism Act and its repurcussions. I replied to him that I had answered his question by telling him that I DID NOT mind him asking, result: - Threatened to arrest me. I told him that if he DID ASK me what I was doing then I would answer, pointing out again that he only ask me If I minded!

He then swore at me and told me to follow him to the station where i would be 'charged' He wouldnt tell me on what charge. At this point I asked him if he was observant? And showed the pics of the Rooks and said did he not notice the large lens on what was obviously a Camera.

I told him that I was not following him and asked for his rank and number, his Duty Sergeants details and the station he worked out of, (this was near Hull). He wanted to know why believe it or not and apart from showing me his ID would not give any other info. At this point I told him I was going to follow him even if it took all his shift and report him for swearing and attempts at false arrest and threatening behavior.

He then said in a very bad temper and I quote 'have a nice day sir' and drove off.

I was in a state, but was not going to let him get the better for nothing more than taking simple photo's.

A Police state, I dont know, but not a good advert for our force. I would certainly never help them out after that.

Comment by paulgee20 posted on photography is not a crime at 22/07/2012 - 08:57

paulgee20
2 and 7 for me Mat, nice ones mate.

Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on Some random sprinkles from Abbotsbury at 21/07/2012 - 19:51

paulgee20
Sorry Jonathan, I will paste here: -


Your name
First line of address
Second line of address
Third line of address
Fourth line of address
Contact telephone number
Owner/Manager’s name
First line of company address
Second line of company address
Third line of company address
Fourth line of company address
Today’s date

Dear Sir/Madam,

RE: Faulty goods and the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended)

On [date of purchase] I bought a [description of purchase] from you for [insert price] which has stopped working.

The problem is [enter description of fault].

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) states that when a consumer buys goods from a trader they must be: as described; of a satisfactory quality; and fit for any purpose made known at the time of sale to the seller.

This legislation also states that the seller, not the manufacturer, is legally obliged to sort out a problem if the goods do not meet these requirements.

The law also says I have six years from the date of purchase to claim damages for faulty goods.

My goods are not [delete as appropriate - as described/fit for purpose/of satisfactory quality] and I wish to claim a [delete as appropriate - repair/replacement/refund] of my goods under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 as amended.

Please respond to my complaint within 7 days from receipt of this letter.

Yours faithfully,
[your name]




Regards


Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on Another K5 problem... at 21/07/2012 - 15:45

paulgee20
Dave

How much inc post for the 135mm, send me a PM i believe I will have that one off you.

Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on Some Lens's For Sale at 21/07/2012 - 15:41

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo