All Forum Comments
Comment by Oggy posted on DA* 16-50 question. at 03/04/2010 - 23:36
It's worth Googling it to see what others say. It seems to cause some problems.
The program doesn't do anything that any other half way decent processing software would allow you to do yourself better in about five minutes.
Comment by Oggy posted on DA* 16-50 question. at 03/04/2010 - 18:49
Out of interest I tried the 18-55, which is the only one of the lenses mentioned above that I have and the results are very similar.
Comment by Oggy posted on DA* 16-50 question. at 03/04/2010 - 15:29
I prefer bears.
Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 02/04/2010 - 23:33
Oh isn't it nice we are leaders, not followers with their uppity cars and wardrobes? Must go again for another drop and see if the food has burnt.
Cheers all,
Stephen
I prefer bears.
I had a BMW, but no N---n. I have two Ducatis, neither of which can I ride.
Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 02/04/2010 - 23:04
I bought the 16-50 just before the prices went stupid last year, and haven't used it a lot since, but when I have, I have to say it has been a bit disappointing. There's something off in the geometry. I know that this is a standard criticism of this lens in some reviews, but I was surprised when I saw how bad it was in the picture below. I appreciate this is the worst case - F2.8 at 16mm. My question is would people expect it to be this bad, or is mine a duffer? Any thoughts appreciated.
[IMG]http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc222/Oggy3323/Pincushion.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by Oggy posted on DA* 16-50 question. at 02/04/2010 - 21:25
Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 02/04/2010 - 21:10
Comment by Oggy posted on Should I ..... at 02/04/2010 - 21:06
Comment by Oggy posted on April Fool's day pranks? at 01/04/2010 - 23:40


Out of interest where did you get your nasty-free copy from? Others might like to know.