Oggy

Joined: 26th December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Oggy
Just come across a curiosity.

Using a 4GB card in all cases

If I take a picture in .dng, the file size is about 23MB and the camera says I can take 166 pictures which gives about 4GB.

If I take a picture in .pef, the file size is about 13MB and the camera says I can take 166 pictures. This gives a card size of about 2GB.

If I take a picture in raw+ (pef + highest quality jpg) the combined file size is about 23MB and I can take 104 pictures. Card size 2.5GB

Can anyone explain this?

Comment by Oggy posted on Number of pictures in different formats at 11/04/2010 - 14:40

Oggy
Oh this is a bit beyond Gaviscon.

It is probably more painful than someone taking your Pentax and replacing it with a Canikon.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 10/04/2010 - 22:42

Oggy
She was framed!!

(Sorry John :blush

Comment by Oggy posted on Clare Photoshoot 9th April 2010 at 10/04/2010 - 21:07

Oggy
A bit gruesome.

Ahhh! that's better.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 10/04/2010 - 20:30

Oggy
Thanks for the kind comments. No buzz, but it tasted ok - a bit like a G&T.

Seems I've got Alien in my right lung.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 10/04/2010 - 15:41

Oggy
I've been on this planet for over fifty years and I had my first dose of morphine this week.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 10/04/2010 - 00:55

Oggy
Er - make them cheaper? (but the same in all other respects :wink

Comment by Oggy posted on How would you improve your Pentax SLR? at 10/04/2010 - 00:53

Oggy
Gwyn wrote:
...The polo has been more hassle than either Mitsubishi was...
Seconded. My wife had a polo and the only thing worse than the car was volkswagen GB/dealership cabal.

It wasn't that hers was a Friday afternoon job. I worked with someone who had one a couple of months newer, and I could tell him what would break next.

Comment by Oggy posted on Car woes at 08/04/2010 - 13:03

Oggy
My diving watch, which is "water resistant to 200metres (unlike me:shock is suitable for dives to 50metres according to the instructions. Um

Comment by Oggy posted on How waterproof? at 07/04/2010 - 21:46

Oggy
Mike-P wrote:
I thought it was Weather Resistant ..
Well said Mike

Quote:
which is quite different to Weather Proof...
in being almost completely meaningless.

Comment by Oggy posted on How waterproof? at 07/04/2010 - 12:57

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo