All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on Sigma 400mm f5.6 *sold* at 29/10/2007 - 12:25
From their FAQ: http://www.isl.co.jp/SILKYPIX/english/support/faqds20e.html#0012
There is a possibility that the downloaded file is corrupted or the system requirements are not suitable for this application.
First, please go to System requirements and confirm your system.
Next, please go to our download page and download the latest program and then please try again.
Hope that helps
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Silkypix Free Version at 31/10/2007 - 13:02
Yes, you can use two applications. I use Picasa for quick location of images, and Silkypix for my RAW conversion. (You can see how I organise things in my Silkypix guide, IIRC.)
Silkypix is definitely worth persisting with - and I think you'll find you do far less messing around in Photoshop (Elements)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Silkypix Free Version at 30/10/2007 - 17:11
I understand the Pentax software that ships with the camera is provided by Silkypix. Is the raw converter in the paid-for version of Silkypix much more advanced than the version that comes with the camera ?
Yup
To expand: the Pentax converter uses the Silkypix v2 "engine". It'll give very fine results indeed.
The paid version (v3) includes features such as:
* Colour choices - e.g. Velvia, Provia, etc
* Fine tuning of colour (using a colour wheel). Very powerful
* Full curves
* Noise reduction
* Excellent sharpening options
* Barrel & vignetting distortion correction
* Upsizing (so you can output absolutely massive size images)
* Tastes (preset functions)
There's more too...
The Free Silkypix may give better results compared to the Pentax converter. However, the Pentax one will read all the camera settings and allow an automatic output of JPG - which is useful if you're in a hurry.
It's definitely worth the money... it's just whether you'll use the features
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Silkypix Free Version at 30/10/2007 - 16:06
To be honest, I can't tell the difference from the original Epsons - which I was very surprised by! Colour was still spot on.
(But for long term prints, I tend to use a print service and get real photographic prints )
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Epson alternative ink cartridges at 29/10/2007 - 08:43
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5866
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5631
Hope they help!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on RAW and Linux at 25/10/2007 - 22:22
Get the 16-45 (which is excellent, BTW), and a set of decent ND grads (like the Cokin Z-Pro + Lee Foundation holder).
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Why the 16 - 45? at 26/10/2007 - 09:46
If you're talking *ist-D/Ds/K10D etc then I have the following setup:
* In the custom menu, disable the AF-on-halfpress
* (For the K10D) make sure the custom function for the AF button is set to "Enable AF"
Then, you focus with your thumb by pressing the AF button on the back. (For the *ist-Ds it uses the OK button when you enable this mode). The shutter will always fire - even when it's out of focus.
Hope that helps!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Allow shutter release when focus not locked at 25/10/2007 - 09:31
What is your opinion on capture one version 4 compared to silkypix 3?
Don't get me wrong, I like C1v4 from what I've seen, and I'll get at least three copies (one bought, 2 from Sandisk cards), but for real work I still use Silkypix DS3.
I often find that trying out images in another converter sometimes help unlock a tricky image, or helps when I'm getting bogged down in stuff.
Hope that's useful!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D vs EOS 40D at 26/10/2007 - 11:02
Do you know when Version 4 is due and what will be included?
(It will work until November 2nd... I think...)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D vs EOS 40D at 26/10/2007 - 09:44


I think all sales negotiations from this forum should be conducted by PM as matter of common courtesy. Just my opinion
(Keeps the noise floor down in the signal-to-noise ratio)
Matt