All Forum Comments
Comment by K10D posted on K7 owners- a few questions? at 04/05/2011 - 02:57
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Urban Graffiti - Shanghai at 04/05/2011 - 00:09
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on More Bugs 'n' Stuff at 02/05/2011 - 23:59

Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Strap ideas at 01/05/2011 - 11:11
I note that there are a few soft focus shots here.
No's. 4, 9,10, 11,14,20 & 21 appear to be not so sharp? Did you PP any shots?
I'm curious as to why you didn't use the hi ISO capability of the K5.
Number 20 with some PP

Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Shanghai Auto Show - The Models at 30/04/2011 - 02:55
[quote:3496ace15f="Cayman"]I think it depends on what your lens line up looks like - if mostly DA lenses then probably not worth pursuing FF. All but one of my lenses are FF so I would be keen to get my hands on a Pentax FF body if the price is similar to the 5DII/D700. I am in agreement with Kris though - I feel no need to upgrade my K20 to a K5 (although the K5 does have better high ISO performance this is not something I need).
Or really downgrade to a 4/3 Pentax
Where on earth is the logic or reason?
Best regards
I wish I was taller, but is there any logic or reason in arguing with my parents about it?[/quote]Too true Don. Those that want a Pentax FF (I used to)should consider an alternative brand (I did).
There's no pleasing some people is there.
I've now had two years of FF use and never looked back. Just imagine it as K5 quality (but 18 months before the K5) with a larger sensor and a full compliment of same brand lenses. Sounds too good to be true doesn't it. Hi ISO, Low noise, huge bright viewfinder and fast glass to boot, hell, you even get shift lenses that work properly, fast accurate AF, an unbelievable flash system and second to none support and service.
We've never had it so good.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Pentax FF - a poll at 29/04/2011 - 15:16
I think it depends on what your lens line up looks like - if mostly DA lenses then probably not worth pursuing FF. All but one of my lenses are FF so I would be keen to get my hands on a Pentax FF body if the price is similar to the 5DII/D700. I am in agreement with Kris though - I feel no need to upgrade my K20 to a K5 (although the K5 does have better high ISO performance this is not something I need).
Or really downgrade to a 4/3 Pentax
Where on earth is the logic or reason?
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Pentax FF - a poll at 29/04/2011 - 14:22
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Does it make any sense to use Pentax in the wedding photography? at 29/04/2011 - 06:47
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Houston Glass at 29/04/2011 - 06:45
nope but if we book a few more weddings, I might buy Gerri a k5....
face it, even with the quality control issue, it is still an awesome camera!
Then, due to the need for a second Nikon body, I bought the D7000. Same sensor and as with the K5, great performer.
Best regards


It’s all good so far, Hi ISO, Low noise, 14 Bit, great IQ, mediocre AF, poor flash system- bettered by using Metz, no long fast glass, over reliance on third party or older glass and a hit and miss QC department.
I like my K7. It produces great images. It bounced, along with my 50-135 SDM along a concrete path and survived without damage. It's been drowned in salt water and it continues to work in the roll I require.
For the area's it does not perform to my needs, I use another make camera and lenses.
Have I missed anything?
Best regards