PLUS

K10D

Joined: 16th January 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

K10D
In the meantime, other people are taking photographs and making images. Are we seeing the first signs of snobbery on the forum?

It’s all good so far, Hi ISO, Low noise, 14 Bit, great IQ, mediocre AF, poor flash system- bettered by using Metz, no long fast glass, over reliance on third party or older glass and a hit and miss QC department.

I like my K7. It produces great images. It bounced, along with my 50-135 SDM along a concrete path and survived without damage. It's been drowned in salt water and it continues to work in the roll I require.

For the area's it does not perform to my needs, I use another make camera and lenses.

Have I missed anything?

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on K7 owners- a few questions? at 04/05/2011 - 02:57

K10D
Great colours. Also a lot of that stuff around WA. It's not classed as vandalism here.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Urban Graffiti - Shanghai at 04/05/2011 - 00:09

K10D
All good work there Steve. Also great DOF.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on More Bugs 'n' Stuff at 02/05/2011 - 23:59

K10D
gartmore wrote:
If security is a concern take a look at this one link
Security wasn't a concern for me, it came as a bonus. Top quality was and the dual harness version is superb. The stainless ball raced fittings are worth every Euro. Bought mine direct from the factory.

Comment Image


Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Strap ideas at 01/05/2011 - 11:11

K10D
Some eye candy indeed.

I note that there are a few soft focus shots here.
No's. 4, 9,10, 11,14,20 & 21 appear to be not so sharp? Did you PP any shots?

I'm curious as to why you didn't use the hi ISO capability of the K5.

Number 20 with some PP

Comment Image


Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Shanghai Auto Show - The Models at 30/04/2011 - 02:55

K10D
Don wrote:
K10D wrote:
thoughton wrote:
[quote:3496ace15f="Cayman"]I think it depends on what your lens line up looks like - if mostly DA lenses then probably not worth pursuing FF. All but one of my lenses are FF so I would be keen to get my hands on a Pentax FF body if the price is similar to the 5DII/D700. I am in agreement with Kris though - I feel no need to upgrade my K20 to a K5 (although the K5 does have better high ISO performance this is not something I need).
I thought you had a 645D? Why would you 'downgrade' to a full frame Pentax?
Or downgrade further to an APS-C Pentax.

Or really downgrade to a 4/3 Pentax

Where on earth is the logic or reason?
Best regards
Pentax does not have a full frame camera. where is the logic and reason behind some peoples constant complaining? You don't hear Subaru owners whining for want of a big block v8, do you? There are a lot of muscle car owners that won't bother challenging a Subaru wrx with it's little 4 banger... or a Lotus with it's little four banger...
I wish I was taller, but is there any logic or reason in arguing with my parents about it?[/quote]Too true Don. Those that want a Pentax FF (I used to)should consider an alternative brand (I did).

There's no pleasing some people is there.

I've now had two years of FF use and never looked back. Just imagine it as K5 quality (but 18 months before the K5) with a larger sensor and a full compliment of same brand lenses. Sounds too good to be true doesn't it. Hi ISO, Low noise, huge bright viewfinder and fast glass to boot, hell, you even get shift lenses that work properly, fast accurate AF, an unbelievable flash system and second to none support and service.

We've never had it so good.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Pentax FF - a poll at 29/04/2011 - 15:16

K10D
thoughton wrote:
Cayman wrote:
I think it depends on what your lens line up looks like - if mostly DA lenses then probably not worth pursuing FF. All but one of my lenses are FF so I would be keen to get my hands on a Pentax FF body if the price is similar to the 5DII/D700. I am in agreement with Kris though - I feel no need to upgrade my K20 to a K5 (although the K5 does have better high ISO performance this is not something I need).
I thought you had a 645D? Why would you 'downgrade' to a full frame Pentax?
Or downgrade further to an APS-C Pentax.

Or really downgrade to a 4/3 Pentax

Where on earth is the logic or reason?

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Pentax FF - a poll at 29/04/2011 - 14:22

K10D
Probably done a dozen weddings in total and always used Pentax. The last wedding I did was in Bahrain and I used the MZ-S and the istD. No problems and lots of good images.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Does it make any sense to use Pentax in the wedding photography? at 29/04/2011 - 06:47

K10D
Cracking set of images. You certainly have mastered that lens.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Houston Glass at 29/04/2011 - 06:45

K10D
Don wrote:
K10D wrote:
Don wrote:
on a more positive note:
link
link
So are you buying a D5100 Don?

Best regards
nope but if we book a few more weddings, I might buy Gerri a k5....
face it, even with the quality control issue, it is still an awesome camera!
I agree. I've always said so. On any other day of the week, I'd have bought one. The sensor issue was enough to frighten me off on the K5.

Then, due to the need for a second Nikon body, I bought the D7000. Same sensor and as with the K5, great performer.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on K5 owners at 29/04/2011 - 01:00

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo