Trying to resist...

do they????

My namesake saved the wrong stores.... I would've saved Jacobs

Many tempting offers, but I will have to hold off for a few months before spending again.

If I didn't have the DA* already...and if only Pentax/Hoya/Ricoh would reproduce the grey paint and Pentax in large bold black letters on the newer lenses I would be seduced.......

I used to own the same lens but can't remember whether it had a focus limiter.......check that just in case...

Pramath is a top bloke - he's replaced the SDM on my 16-50 and currently has me FA*28-70 for repair.

Lovely chap to speak with. Free short term parking at the Albany Parade.

Do you also need to speak with Divorce lawyers?

You pay £5 for a magazine - you expect them to get it right. Incorrect detail or something just missing changes the perception of a lot of people to brands like Pentax,Sony and Olympus...

I have my magazines sent to my parents address (legacy of having lived abroad) and so that my late father (who introduced me to the K-mount) could have a read...

I pick up my Practical Photography (sometimes good items) and have a look at the item about the sharp lenses under £1000 - three Pentax lenses on test - the 100WR macro and the DA*55 being 2 and the last one being the FA77. Apparently, the 100 macro was the only WR lens in the test. HELLO Practical Photography - DO YOUR RESEARCH!! the DA* lenses are all WR... Plus there is a mugshot of our esteemed PUT member.

I throw the PP down and pick up Digital Camera. It does a test of all wildlife lenses....guess what's missing... Doesn't help if Sigma or Tamron don't cater for Pentax at the moment but the message comes across that Pentax doesn't cater for wildlife...

Time to start saving money I think

GROYNES!!! any images of groins would only serve to be noticed by local plod