Any of the standard 18-55 lenses would be worth having.

The only difference between the Mk1 and Mk2 models is an extra coating allowing better resolution on the larger sensors.

If you have the L version then really the best upgrade would be to the 16-50 or similar.

If you mean the standard 18-55 then the version is around the objective bezel.

That is look at the lens end where it says 18-55. f3.5-... and at the end will be the version.

II means mark2, L means light weight, this one also has a plastic mount and WR which is the weather proof one.

As far as I can remember.

Erm, would that be Fullers frame format?

Morrisons, They also have Kingfisher at the same price!

I hope you mean poSt Gwyn..

I work in the public domain as a Park Ranger, when I approach photographers they ALWAYS assume I'm going to tell them off or demand they stop using their kit.

When I talk about the camera and point out photo opportunities they leave with a grin on their faces.

Why do idiot security men and police officers have to be so heavy handed and aggressive?

It does nobody any favours and only undermines any respect we, the public, have left for them.

I'm for the PDF option, it will make reading a little more awkward but allow easier archiving.

Just £1 each, and yes it isn't square, what do you expect?

The only current reason for a 64gig card I can see is as a solid state hard drive in a net book or the like.

But when the behemoth full frame sensors and the new 645d hit the market....

The K10 and K200 share the same sensor, but the K200 is easier to use.

The K10 was the flagship model, making it just a little less 'new user' friendly.

I have a K200d and find it easy to use, the shake reduction is very effective and it has the (dis)advantage of using AA batteries, that's a topic already discussed else where on here!

Just watch the lens, early K200s came with the older lens, the Mk II version is supposed to be for the larger K20 sensor, but seems sharper on the 10 meg K200.