gregmoll

Joined: 10th July 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

gregmoll
Thanks for the thoughts, I'll pack it in a bag and store it for a rainy day.
Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Lunasix 3 light-meter at 31/10/2009 - 15:53

gregmoll
Thanks,
So much info.

johnriley wrote:

No, I don't see any point to using a separate meter
And here was I hoping I could resurrect a treasure.
Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Lunasix 3 light-meter at 31/10/2009 - 14:10

gregmoll
I have an old Lunasix 3 light-meter in perfect condition and I see that B & H have a battery adaptor from Gossen ($39+shipping) which allows the use of silver oxide batteries in place of the original mercury batteries.

Is there really any purpose in having a working light-meter when the camera does all the metering I normally requires and I'm sure a new digital model would be easier to use, should I need one.

It's such a beautiful bit of equipment that it seems a waste to just leave it lying in a box

I'm surprised by the amount of information available on the web relating to the Lunasix 3.


Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Lunasix 3 light-meter at 31/10/2009 - 13:52

gregmoll
When I've cut old split focusing screens down to size for my K200D I hold the screen by it's sides and wash it with dish washing liquid soap and a soft artist paint brush, rinse and pat not rub dry with lens tissue.

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Focus screen tool at 29/10/2009 - 16:08

gregmoll
[quote:3496ace15f="johnriley"]
Quote:


No. You'll notice that when using the reduced size format the number of pixels used reduces from 24.5MP to 10.5MP - this is because we are now only using the centre part of the frame.
That is how I understood it.

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Dynamic Range and Medium Format at 27/10/2009 - 16:37

gregmoll
I agree with you.

My understanding was that his camera a Nikon D3x could be switched between formats link and he believed that without moving or changing lenses that the image size projected on the sensor would increase or decrease dependant on the format he selected.

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Dynamic Range and Medium Format at 27/10/2009 - 05:41

gregmoll
I have a friend who bought the latest most expensive FF Nikon which can switch between the two formats. He would not belive that regardless of the sensor size selected the the image progected onto the sensor remained the same size.

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Dynamic Range and Medium Format at 27/10/2009 - 00:31

gregmoll
A very basic question about the FF, APS-C debate. I assume that the comparisons are done using the same lens and that the FF photo is taken from closer to the subject so that in both cases the identically framed image occupies the full sensor.

I appreciate that the pixel density of the sensor will also play a part in the detail captured.

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Dynamic Range and Medium Format at 27/10/2009 - 00:06

gregmoll
Lovely, please tell me that it was a dead fly, the flies around here are not co-operative.

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on What am I ?? at 25/10/2009 - 06:35

gregmoll
Very impressive, what lens combination did you use and how far was the subject from the front lens. It must take ages to set up each shot.

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on What am I ?? at 25/10/2009 - 02:38

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo