All Forum Comments
Comment by DrOrloff posted on [OT] Through the wormhole. at 05/12/2012 - 22:46
Comment by DrOrloff posted on K5 II - £100 Extra part-exchange! at 05/12/2012 - 19:15
Comment by DrOrloff posted on few recent shots at 02/12/2012 - 22:19
Comment by DrOrloff posted on few recent shots at 02/12/2012 - 20:52
Comment by DrOrloff posted on Should I buy a 'Q' at 02/12/2012 - 12:58
Comment by DrOrloff posted on Should I buy a 'Q' at 02/12/2012 - 12:44
Comment by DrOrloff posted on Should I buy a 'Q' at 02/12/2012 - 12:28
I use it for family snapshots, discreet street work, experimenting, a go everywhere camera and high magnification shots of the Moon. I find image quality to be way better than expected, noise is an inevitable consequence of such a tiny sensor. In the right hands the Q is very capable.
Build quality is top notch, I have no concerns about the pop uf flash which I rarely use. f1.9 is bright enough for most situations.
I think the accuracy of metering is really good, I find it better than the K5, that's a real plus for grabbed shots.
I really like the look of B&W images from the Q.
There is some shutter lag. I think that's to be expected. Sports photography with the Q is going to be a bit tricky.
I have a cheap K/Q adaptor. There is an official one with a built in shutter which is pretty essential if you plan on using it on fast moving objects or with longer telephoto lenses. Some love elaborate setups for extreme focal lengths. I think adapted lenses have some specialist uses but I am generally unimpressed with the image quality. Others are more impressed. There are plenty of examples available so you can make up your own mind.
Comment by DrOrloff posted on Should I buy a 'Q' at 02/12/2012 - 10:50
Comment by DrOrloff posted on Gear for Sale - Weekend Update at 01/12/2012 - 22:00
Comment by DrOrloff posted on Day release pass.. at 01/12/2012 - 21:58


Not necessarily.
Someone from the past could only tell someone from the future about time travel once time travel has been invented. And it hasn't yet. Future time travel though is theoretically possible.
I agree that someone from the future would have told us if backwards time travel were possible. Either that or they would have kept quiet about it but William Hills would have gone out of business.
So that leaves forwards time travel. However, how would someone from the past prove to someone from the future that they had travelled through time?