All Forum Comments
I have a ZX81..........It is a bit slow with PS though
John
John
Comment by DOIK posted on Another pointless thread at 22/12/2012 - 18:23
judderman62 wrote:
1/8 sec ..handheld ?
Correct and the verticals were only 1.5 degrees off as well: better than most of my shots in daylight1/8 sec ..handheld ?
John
Comment by DOIK posted on Digital Camera Magazine - Pentax K-30 at 19/12/2012 - 10:04
cabstar wrote:
I don't know how the af is poor in low light as its better than the original k-5
It must be good then. I posted this picture on Monday, taken in Durham Cathedral in total darkness apart from a few candles.The procession was walking towards us, exposure detail iso 12800,1/8 sec , f3.5. The picture is lighter than it was on the night,one of the press guys who was using white lenses was moaning about the conditions.I don't know how the af is poor in low light as its better than the original k-5
I thought this was the ultimate test in low light conditions, unless you have a black cat and a coal hole
link
John:
Comment by DOIK posted on Digital Camera Magazine - Pentax K-30 at 19/12/2012 - 09:18
Mannesty wrote:
You beat me to it Peter.obione wrote:
As you have to import your images into lightroom, lightroom does dictate where you have your images, in photoshop you open say on a memory stick and save back to the memory stick..
Not so in lightroom.
With all due respect, that is utter rubbish.As you have to import your images into lightroom, lightroom does dictate where you have your images, in photoshop you open say on a memory stick and save back to the memory stick..
Not so in lightroom.
John
Comment by DOIK posted on Lightroom 4 AND Photoshop? at 15/12/2012 - 15:39
Blythman wrote:
With a click of a button I can get an instant idea as to whether I think B&W will work
With the click of a button I can put in a cloudWith a click of a button I can get an instant idea as to whether I think B&W will work
Much safer than clambering over wet rocks.
Just give the nod Alan.
John
Comment by DOIK posted on Dunstanburgh Castle at 04/12/2012 - 13:29
johnriley wrote:
There are images to process
I would think that's why LR was brought out.There are images to process
Images to fiddle with.... PS.
Where does Illustrator lie in this discussion?
John
Comment by DOIK posted on Lightroom 4 AND Photoshop? at 03/12/2012 - 09:09
Comment by DOIK posted on Another pointless thread at 30/11/2012 - 10:58
CoE view on weddings LINK I wonder how many wedding photographers know about these let alone read them.
As reported on the DPS blog LINK
John
As reported on the DPS blog LINK
John
Comment by DOIK posted on Wedding Photographer Shuts Down Business at 29/11/2012 - 15:36
Comment by DOIK posted on Another pointless thread at 26/11/2012 - 08:40
Yours indecisively,[/quote]If I had to choose between the 2 operating systems I'd go for windows 7 every time. That's not to say windows 8 is rubbish, its just different to all the other operating systems from windows.
If your shopping for a new lap/desk top I'd go with windows 7.[/quote]That is the understatement of the year. To someone who has come from XP and still in use, it makes working on LR and PS a breeze in comparison . Long live XP
I do have a copy of 7 bought at the launch but never used,I have just bought a new PC with 8 on it and it is a nightmare! or is that different.
John