All Forum Comments
Comment by DOIK posted on Using ink on B&W print? at 29/03/2013 - 09:56
Thanks to all for taking time to comment.
Smeggy, I tend not to ask subjects their religion. After all I was just taking his photograph, not carrying some dangerous medical procedure
I think he may have been a goth as he brought up Whitby in conversation.
John
Smeggy, I tend not to ask subjects their religion. After all I was just taking his photograph, not carrying some dangerous medical procedure
I think he may have been a goth as he brought up Whitby in conversation.
John
Comment by DOIK posted on A few with 18-55 WR lens at 29/03/2013 - 09:51
Ian, it should work.
Custom settings 3 option 17 set to 2.
It seems the flash will still fire to operate the remote one but will not influence the exposure.
John
Custom settings 3 option 17 set to 2.
It seems the flash will still fire to operate the remote one but will not influence the exposure.
John
Comment by DOIK posted on Off camera flash at 27/03/2013 - 12:41
The 20th March is St Cuthbert's day here are a few pictures taken at the event with the 18-55 WR lens.
A Pilgrim, or onlooker not sure.
St Cuthbert's tomb and banner.
The Great Kitchen.
I think this lens is a cracker.
John
A Pilgrim, or onlooker not sure.
St Cuthbert's tomb and banner.
The Great Kitchen.
I think this lens is a cracker.
John
Comment by DOIK posted on A few with 18-55 WR lens at 27/03/2013 - 09:19
Comment by DOIK posted on Off camera flash at 26/03/2013 - 13:53
elfer wrote:
LINKgwing wrote:
For those who want to optimise results in the digital world, and are willing to pay the somewhat heavy price of having every photograph looking totally overexposed until post processed, the best way is to shoot in raw and overexpose every shot as much as possible without burning out highlights. Maximum image information with minimum noise is then available for use.
That's not the usual advice, but it is something I've read or heard somewhere before. I can't remember where - it may have been one of B & H's online presentations - but it was from a well respected source. And I have to say it does make a lot of sense when I think about it.For those who want to optimise results in the digital world, and are willing to pay the somewhat heavy price of having every photograph looking totally overexposed until post processed, the best way is to shoot in raw and overexpose every shot as much as possible without burning out highlights. Maximum image information with minimum noise is then available for use.
John
The scammers new disk must be out, I have had five phishing emails in the last four days. The originators have used the same format in the sender box ie Manager...... and tracking information in the subject line of four of them. You would think they would be a little more creative
Oh, also one from paypal
No doubt they will catch someone out.
The real fishing season starts on the 22nd March and I have just serviced two reels and my licence is here, only the permit to sort out
John
Oh, also one from paypal
No doubt they will catch someone out.
The real fishing season starts on the 22nd March and I have just serviced two reels and my licence is here, only the permit to sort out
John
Comment by DOIK posted on Another pointless thread at 19/03/2013 - 13:29
Quote:
Unfortunately even Photoshop can't make a Silk Purse out of a Sow's Ear..!! Or at least with my Sow's Ear's it can't..!!
But it can correct the misuse of the apostrophe.Unfortunately even Photoshop can't make a Silk Purse out of a Sow's Ear..!! Or at least with my Sow's Ear's it can't..!!
And a lot cheaper.
John
Comment by DOIK posted on Is photoshop ruining photography at 12/03/2013 - 17:00
Have you checked the write protect switch?
John
John
Comment by DOIK posted on Have I got a faulty SDHC card? at 05/03/2013 - 16:28
John