All Forum Comments
Comment by davidstorm posted on fs:Pentax k-01 boxed superb condition at 04/07/2013 - 19:41
Giorgio has already explained that he meant speed, not accuracy.
It might be nice if you researched the facts a little more thoroughly before trying to make me look an idiot, your comments may be more effective that way.
Best wishes
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on K-30 vs OM-D at 04/07/2013 - 19:30
Strange...
I've been fortunate to try all the Sigmas (old and new) and still maintain the 150 500 to be much sharper.
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on SIGMA 50-500 "old" vs "new" at 04/07/2013 - 18:17
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on fs:Pentax k-01 boxed superb condition at 03/07/2013 - 23:08
Steve, I just read some of Benjamin Kanarek's posts on his blog, and he is not very happy with Pentax camera's AF accuracy.
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on K-30 vs OM-D at 02/07/2013 - 23:58
When the lens was at JPS I nearly bought a DA17-70 from Jessops - AF on the copy I looked at failed out of the box...
For example, you are a Saab owner I presume? How many people would relate poor experiences with a Saab? I'm a former 9-3 owner and loved the car but I did have to have a few bits replaced!
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Replacing the kit lens: what's faster with more range? at 02/07/2013 - 23:46
The AF is not lightning fast, but is perfectly adequate and I haven't really missed any shots because of it.
Hope this is useful.
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Replacing the kit lens: what's faster with more range? at 02/07/2013 - 21:07
The Pentax name still does have some resonance due to the heritage, I don't think they will drop it from the cameras and I do think that there is a lot to be positive about.
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Pentax Ricoh at 02/07/2013 - 21:00
I think it is really brave of you to bare your soul like this in public and I really hope the messages you have had from the members on the Forum have helped you a little.
I will add my sincere best wishes to this thread and I hope it too helps in just a small way.
Best wishes
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on A terrible ordeal. at 02/07/2013 - 20:49
I don't think the F4 aperture is that much of an issue as you have a K-5, so you can push up the ISO if necessary.
It is a belter of a lens, the only downside to me is that it distorts quite heavily at wide angles, but this is easy to correct either in camera or afterwards, so it's not really a problem.
I would recommend this lens, but I haven't tried any of the others you have suggested. I noticed that the 17-70 can be bought for around £350 brand new if you shop around; at this price it is a steal.
Regards
David
Comment by davidstorm posted on Replacing the kit lens: what's faster with more range? at 02/07/2013 - 20:44


No response to the PM, so I PM'd today offering to collect from wherever the seller wished and got a message back to say that the item was sold to someone else, minus battery and charger! If the seller had said to me that he preferred to sell without battery and charger I would have agreed this immediately, but no message was received.
There was no indication that the item was for sale elsewhere and I'm sure my PM was the first.
I don't like to post like this, but it's left a sour taste as this was intended to be a present for my wife.
Not happy.
Regards
David