Comments made by davex - Page 123

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

I have had this function turned on since I got the camera.

Have read in another post; "some people think this is not a good idea".
Could "some people" explain further:

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on K20 sensor clean on start up at 13/08/2009 - 12:30

Quote:
or is that just naive thinking!

Yes it is, remember the tele-converter will reduce the light transmission by 2 stops anyway. So apart from reduced IQ because of the extra glass, your 2.8 would become a 5.6 at best. Much better to get a cheaper zoom; have you tried the Tammy 70-300, much better than comprimising the DA 50-135.

Davex.

editted, stupid remarks

Comment by davex posted on Zoom or teleconverter? at 12/08/2009 - 22:13

Quote:
Could we adjust the gallery that only photos taken with a PENTAX CAMERA can be uploaded, after all we who subscribe to PU use PENTAX CAMERAS, just a rant!!!

Totally agree.

Comment by davex posted on Intrigued! at 12/08/2009 - 22:08

The store locator still is`nt working, one wonders if they ever check their own website, possibly one of the worst examples of ecommerce i have ever seen.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Jessops has GONE at 12/08/2009 - 17:12

Always a danger of change for change sake. The buttons are clear and logical to me.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Site Feedback at 12/08/2009 - 10:07

No 1 for me, the colours on the background of number2 are distracting from the subject. Off course some one else will probably have another idea

Anyway, congrats for percevering with getting both images on the post.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on wormer worm at 11/08/2009 - 17:31

Quote:
Have to totally agree with Lil Andy - non-originals may not last, they can clog or cause damage, colour rendition can be different, viscosity different so the amount dispensed changes and if you have an original in one colour reservoir and a compatible in the next, can you be sure there will not be an adverse reaction between them?

Perhaps I am missing something here: As the cartridges come with their own print heads how can they damage or interfere with the printer: I understand the ink may not last as long (fade) but how can it damage a printer when the ink is squirted directly onto the paper:

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Where to buy good quality Canon printer ink cartridges at 11/08/2009 - 17:28

Sounds like a great opportunity, unfortunately it will be cloudy in chester.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Fireworks tonight and tomorrow in Plymouth at 11/08/2009 - 16:56

Not wishing to start a war or anything but I am interested in the various opinions. Surely if the child is important it should get equal treatment within the image? by popping the bubble (no pun intended) it atracts all the attention, anything else within the frame then becomes subordinate to it.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Our world in a bubble at 10/08/2009 - 20:34

Think the bubble is the interest, in this image the child is just a distraction.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Our world in a bubble at 10/08/2009 - 17:43

Proudly supporting Pentax User

davex

All Forum Comments

All Forum Comments

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Proudly supporting Pentax User