All Forum Comments
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on cheap macro (microscope!) lens order. at 20/01/2008 - 22:45
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on K10D...how to change ISO? at 17/01/2008 - 23:41
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on K10D...how to change ISO? at 17/01/2008 - 23:32
If I'm in manual mode, I find it easier to quickly switch to Av, adjust the ISO, then switch back to manual, rather than going to the function button.
E-dial functions are controlled from the custom setting menu.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on K10D...how to change ISO? at 17/01/2008 - 23:31

I do resize in stages, but I halve the dimensions each time, and use USM. Will try it with the high pass filter though.
Why do you upsize your pics to 11Mb though??
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Resizing and sharpening at 17/01/2008 - 18:28
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Thanks Lilly!! at 19/01/2008 - 00:23
I'll have a quick look now, if I find anything I'll let you know.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Thanks Lilly!! at 18/01/2008 - 23:50
It looks like it's been saved on the lowest quality setting when 'saving for web' in photoshop, but if the original jpeg looked okay, then photobucket must have done something to it.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Thanks Lilly!! at 17/01/2008 - 23:49
I'm unwilling to pay thru the nose to get tommorows valuless junk, should i wish to trade it in, or more likely, need to get it repaired.
I justified 'going digital' by working out how much I was saving by not buying film. I was paying about £7.50 to buy and process a roll of slides, and my initial digital investment (3 years ago) was about £1400. 4 months later, having shot about 6500 images, I decided I was quids in.
In addition to that, I'd shot subjects that I would never have seriously considered before (macro for one), and tried techniques that I wouldn't have bothered with using film.
To an extent, digital cameras are disposable. I agree with you there. They will certainly get to a point where a repair is not viable, and that will be much sooner than with a film camera. However, if nothing goes wrong with it, and it produces results that you're happy with, there's no reason why you couldn't keep one for years.
If you're not desperate to get one before the K20D comes out, I'd hang on and get yourself a secondhand K10D. I would imagine there'll be a fair few popping up in camera shops/ebay. You may yet see mine on there...
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Focus on imaging show at 19/02/2008 - 16:40
It does depend on the printer (i.e. what type of ink it uses) and the paper, as if the paper doesn't absorb the ink correctly it can shorten its lifespan.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Epson Photo paper and original inks at 15/01/2008 - 18:10


Dan still gets the cigar
But just hasn't got a week to get the thing in focus.
But has now got a 10mm lens he could try reversing...
Might give it a go tomorrow.
Dan