All Forum Comments
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Current Lens Range at 03/02/2008 - 13:50
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on hi, just a quick picture to see if i can post it! at 02/02/2008 - 10:51
Plenty of offers coming including a demo day in the middle of March
Will you have the new lenses to play with too?
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Pentax K20D/K200D Launch Party 29th March 2008 at 01/02/2008 - 14:42
Thanks Dan And mine is boxed with the Pentax pouch
That'll do nicely for my K20D fund
Matt
The price of them is definitely bouyant.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on For Sale K10D + many extras at 25/02/2008 - 23:01
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on For Sale K10D + many extras at 18/02/2008 - 10:54
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on For Sale K10D + many extras at 18/02/2008 - 10:33
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on For Sale K10D + many extras at 04/02/2008 - 11:14
However, Benjikan never elaborated on his statement "This is a camera that is almost too quiet, if there is such a thing"
Looks I'll be offloading some Pentax gear to pay for the K20D...
Matt
MZ-5N anyone? SMC FAJ 18-35?
How about a 1.7x AF converter? The way they've been selling lately, I reckon that should about cover it. Offers anybody?
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on For Sale K10D + many extras at 01/02/2008 - 17:36
...just read this through, sounds like he's died!
I just hope Pete doesn't regret his decision. His main gripe with the K10D as far as weddings were concerned was the noise, which he considered excessive. However, Benjikan never elaborated on his statement "This is a camera that is almost too quiet, if there is such a thing", and with extended dynamic range, I fear (for Pete's sake) the K20D may be perfect for weddings.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on For Sale K10D + many extras at 01/02/2008 - 12:42
That SDM converter - is not announced as a teleconverter with a crop factor. Any ideas why?
I actually thought until I read this thread that the converter was to give SDM to common AF lenses. I might be completely wrong on this.....
I suppose they could produce the equivalent of the 1.7x AF convertor, if future bodies don't have an in-body AF motor? But the first option is the one I would go for.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on New 55, 60-250, and 17-70 Announced at 01/02/2008 - 12:24
What was it going for John : Just curious
Dan
Although it would be nice to know, I've got 50 quid or so knocking about...