All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Lens for my new K-X at 30/06/2010 - 11:11
What puzzles me is that many of the small minority of Police who behave in this way would probably point to Life on Mars, Ashes to Ashes, The Professionals and/or The Sweeney as "how Policing should be". I don't recall any of those fictional characters hassling people just for taking photos, in fact Cowley went out of his way to demolish a senior officer who was abusing Police powers and ignoring the law.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on let''s support the powers that be? at 30/06/2010 - 11:05
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Lens for my new K-X at 29/06/2010 - 23:21
Comment by Dangermouse posted on website at 29/06/2010 - 20:48
My active film collection is likely to settle to a KX, MX, and ME Super, the latter two being fitted with power winders. I do have several others but those are my three favourites. So that's one body loaded with B&W, one loaded with colour slide, and one resting.
I still think about an LX, only thing putting me off is that even scruffy ones seem to go for £200+, with the additional viewfinders and winders similarly priced. I'll agree they're nice cameras but I'm not sure they're £150 nicer than an MX...
Comment by Dangermouse posted on DA 40 f2.8 and film at 29/06/2010 - 19:52
It`s actually raining here !!!!!! First time I`ve seen it in weeks !!
Been down to the post box just to cool off - visitors tonight so still not looked at Jersey pics - nice to see everyone getting on famously on "other" topic pages - ??
Must say the monopod was a boon - best £7.99 I ever spent.
I kept the lenshood on "all" the time JR ( except for fill flash )
Managed to fill an 8gb card anyway.
Maybe tomorrow eh ?
Tony
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 28/06/2010 - 21:37
Comment by Dangermouse posted on LBA kicks in (again) at 28/06/2010 - 21:21
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Updates are ready for your computer. at 27/06/2010 - 14:38
If I remember correctly, the 28/3.5 is thought to be better than the 28/2.8 (or at least someone here keeps saying it is )
Although I can't take the credit. I found it listed on another site where a few people reckoned it to be only just behind the K 28mm f3.5, which in turn seems to be regarded as the best Pentax 28mm prime. As a result I bought one and I've had no complaints. You can blow images taken with it up to a surprising degree without making them unusably fuzzy. See these two:
[IMG]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x21/Kingofthemountains/Landscapes/IMGP1377.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x21/Kingofthemountains/Landscapes/IMGP1386.jpg[/IMG]
No alterations, shot as JPGs and simply uploaded then reduced to 640x480.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Lens for my new K-X at 26/06/2010 - 22:16
Comment by Dangermouse posted on A freebie that may be worth getting? at 26/06/2010 - 16:34


I really think Pentax could profitably wind up CaNikSon by making a cheap-but-decent 28mm AF prime. Other brands have a cheap 50mm f1.8, on an APS-C sensor the 28mm focal length gives a field of view close to the perfect 43mm on film. Pitch it at about £150 or so and they'd sell plenty.