website
Posted 29/06/2010 - 10:25
Link
not really, just make sure you have lots of text it can latch on to, and is linked from as many other sites as possible - ideally other photography or isle of wight sites... will take a while...
Still shooting in the dark (literally and metaphorically)...
Posted 29/06/2010 - 10:27
Link
I had a look at your web site. Why does the home page try to install a Microsoft Office XP application?
Also, nice pictures in the Gallery. But they should have been clickable for larger size. Now they are too small to be really appreciated.
But the site layout and design looks good.
Also, nice pictures in the Gallery. But they should have been clickable for larger size. Now they are too small to be really appreciated.
But the site layout and design looks good.
Best regards
Terry
K20D, Optio I10, DA 18-55 1:3.5-5.6 AL II, A 1:1.7/50, D FA 1:2.8/100 Macro, Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Pentax AF 360FGZ
Terry
K20D, Optio I10, DA 18-55 1:3.5-5.6 AL II, A 1:1.7/50, D FA 1:2.8/100 Macro, Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Pentax AF 360FGZ
Posted 29/06/2010 - 11:12
Link
A thought: your programme is an important indicator of what you have on offer and new prospective members will want to see that. Existing members will download a PDF but I doubt that casual viewers will.
Why not have a Programme tab that just lists your schedule on the page?
Also, a casual glance like I've just made gave me no idea what day and time you regularly meet.
Hope that helps!
Why not have a Programme tab that just lists your schedule on the page?
Also, a casual glance like I've just made gave me no idea what day and time you regularly meet.
Hope that helps!
Best regards, John
Posted 29/06/2010 - 19:05
Link
Thanks for your comments and encouragement. It's trial and error for us.
No one in the club would claim to be computer literate.
Gareth, a little comment of humour. How many visually impared photographers do you know? but I take your point. Experience is everything and we need to take every comment on board.
regards thoramay.
No one in the club would claim to be computer literate.
Gareth, a little comment of humour. How many visually impared photographers do you know? but I take your point. Experience is everything and we need to take every comment on board.
regards thoramay.
Posted 29/06/2010 - 19:37
Link
I've realised your images are actually full size and being sized by your HTML. Unfortunately browsers are not very sophisticated so the image quality is being severely degraded and gives the impression of heavy sharpening.
I would suggest that you try sizing the pictures in Photoshop (to the size you want them to appear) and then re-uploading them. It should look a lot better.
Otherwise, good work.
I would suggest that you try sizing the pictures in Photoshop (to the size you want them to appear) and then re-uploading them. It should look a lot better.
Otherwise, good work.
Posted 29/06/2010 - 20:48
Link
Google are likely to notice the site on their own IIRC - I know I wrote one for a volunteer group which was rapidly picked up and indexed without any effort on my part.
Matt
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Posted 30/06/2010 - 00:04
Link
Do a search on Search Engine Optimisation, and follow the advice given.
G
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 30/06/2010 - 11:38
Link
Thoramay, are you aware the site doesn't work properly in Internet Explorer? In Lifeyo's FAQs is states "Lifeyo works best with Firefox, Safari or Chrome. We're working hard to get Internet Explorer supported in the next few weeks."
Seeing as a large proportion of web users use IE, this isn't ideal. Maybe it will change in the next few weeks, maybe that message has been there for 4 months already...
Dan
Seeing as a large proportion of web users use IE, this isn't ideal. Maybe it will change in the next few weeks, maybe that message has been there for 4 months already...
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 30/06/2010 - 12:50
Link
I would question the competence of any web site company whose sites didn't work in IE.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 30/06/2010 - 13:33
Link
cardiff_gareth wrote:
There's a lot more, too much really to put in a thread !
There are lots of companies doing all sorts of things, but there is loads of information on SEO on the net.George Lazarette wrote:
Do a search on Search Engine Optimisation, and follow the advice given.
G
THB, not wanting to dismiss your suggestion but there are companies out there making £££'s from search engine optimisation (SEO) so your not really gonna find that sort of help on the net.Do a search on Search Engine Optimisation, and follow the advice given.
G
There's a lot more, too much really to put in a thread !
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 30/06/2010 - 14:29
Link
[/quote]Have you added any meta and data tags within your HTML coding with keywords to help bump you up the rankings and to aid your website relavence :[/quote]Google doesnt really use meta tags any more.
Posted 30/06/2010 - 16:52
Link
thoramay wrote:
Thanks for your comments and encouragement. It's trial and error for us.
No one in the club would claim to be computer literate.
Gareth, a little comment of humour. How many visually impared photographers do you know? but I take your point. Experience is everything and we need to take every comment on board.
regards thoramay.
link
Thanks for your comments and encouragement. It's trial and error for us.
No one in the club would claim to be computer literate.
Gareth, a little comment of humour. How many visually impared photographers do you know? but I take your point. Experience is everything and we need to take every comment on board.
regards thoramay.
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.
Apparently.
Apparently.
Posted 30/06/2010 - 20:48
Link
robbie.
You are confusing physical sight with visual impairment in that you cannot 'see' a joke or 'see' the point of a story or a 'see' great photo shot.
'Seeing is visual.. not 'seeing' is impairment.. Get it!!
You must nit pic on my threads.
Give it a rest.
Thoramay.
You are confusing physical sight with visual impairment in that you cannot 'see' a joke or 'see' the point of a story or a 'see' great photo shot.
'Seeing is visual.. not 'seeing' is impairment.. Get it!!
You must nit pic on my threads.
Give it a rest.
Thoramay.
Posted 30/06/2010 - 23:35
Link
Thoramay,
You are confusing the intentions of Gareth's post. He was talking about people with visual impairment. I assumed you realised that when you made your response with no smiley (the generally accepted indicator of a joke).
I was merely pointing out that photographers with visual impairment do exist.
No need to get so uptight about it, relax, it will prolong your life.
P.S. Many thanks for the lovely PM, I will ensure it gets dealt with appropriately.
You are confusing the intentions of Gareth's post. He was talking about people with visual impairment. I assumed you realised that when you made your response with no smiley (the generally accepted indicator of a joke).
I was merely pointing out that photographers with visual impairment do exist.
No need to get so uptight about it, relax, it will prolong your life.
P.S. Many thanks for the lovely PM, I will ensure it gets dealt with appropriately.
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.
Apparently.
Apparently.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


618 posts
17 years
HTTP://iowphotographicsociety.lifeyo.com/home
regards thoramay.